In order not to let China catch up, Raimondo implemented a bill, and as a result, TSMC picked a pick

Mondo Technology Updated on 2024-02-29

Recently, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Raimondo is once again on the cusp of the storm, about his inIntelactivities aboutChipsThe speech in the field once again sparked heated discussions. Raimondo again mentions ".Chipsbills to prevent China from inChipsThe field surpasses the United States. However, in the face of this initiative,TSMCBut he picked on his son and refused to set up a factory in the United States, which caused the United States and the worldChipsDisputes over businesses. This article will delve into the background, impact and future trend of this event.

Raimondo is inIntelThe event was again mentioned in the eventChipsAct", emphasizing the United States inSemiconductorsThe field needs further efforts to stay ahead of the curve. The move is aimed at restricting China's inChipsand strengthen the U.S. voice in the international market. However, this initiative has also sparked internationalChipsCorporate dissatisfaction and opposition.

Raimondo worked tirelessly to promote ".ChipsThe implementation of the Act is an attempt to hinder China's presence through legal meansChipsdevelopment of the field. His actions were exposedUnited States**Concerns about the Huawei incident, as well as concerns about China's technological prowess. This policy has aroused doubts in the international community, which believes that the hegemonic stance of the United States in the field of technology is too tough and may trigger a technological cold war.

TSMCAs a worldwide renownedChipsOne of the manufacturing companies announced a plan to postpone the establishment of a factory in the United States, a move that sparked discussion and speculation from all sides. It is reported thatTSMCRightUnited States**The promise was not fulfilled, leading to its decision to suspend production. This move letsUnited States**Faced withTSMCThe boycott and ** of well-known enterprises also exposed the lack of trust and concern of the United States for foreign companies.

United States**Although the promise is rightChipsManufacturing companies provide subsidies, but the delay has not been resolved, resulting inTSMCand other companies have doubts about their plans to set up factories in the United States. And at the same time,IntelBut unexpectedly received billions of dollars in subsidies, this partiality is puzzling. TSMCThe act of provoking has also made the international community look at the United StatesChipsQuestioning fairness in industry demonstrates the double standard of the United States in its handling of international cooperation.

The United States is inChipsThe performance of the field has aroused the attention and concern of the international community. United States**Trying to push through the domesticChipsproduction to control the worldChipsindustry pattern, and for outsidersChipsThe attitude of enterprises shows unusual bias and preference. TSMCThe provocative behavior exposes the U.S.'s bias towards supporting local companies, while lacking commitment and support for foreign companies.

Samsungand other international large-scaleChipsBusinesses are also facing the challenges of coming fromUnited States**The pressure and influence of their treatment of the United StatesChipsThe industry's policies are worried. United States**unilateral acts against the internationalChipsThe development and cooperation of the industry has brought challenges and uncertainties that may affect the whole worldChipsChainstability and development.

Raimondo has recently been promoting theChipsThe bill is trying to stop China from doing so through legal meansChipsdevelopment of the field. However,TSMCand so onChipsThe provocative behavior of corporations exposes the United States' handling of the international communityChipsbias and unfairness in industrial relations. United States**To the nativeChipsThere is significantly more support from companies than attention to foreign companies, and this behavior may have an international impactChipsThe development and cooperation of the industry has a negative impact. The international community should be called upon to pay attention to the presence of the United StatesChipsThe practice of the industry promotes countries to achieve a fair and mutually beneficial situation in technological development and cooperation.

Related Pages