Qualcomm has not cooperated with Chinese companies, but it has helped India, and the position of Chinese companies in India may be reversed?
Text: Puppy Conversation Technology.
Qualcomm is considered one of the few U.S. companies to take advantage of both ends in the context of changes to U.S. chip regulations. In the ranks of the reconciliation lobby, the CEO of Qualcomm has not yet been subpoenaed. Under the previous chip ban, Qualcomm's influence was relatively small, and it could even openly confront Chinese companies. At the same time, in the mainland market, Qualcomm has begun to work closely with many companies, including chip foundries.
Even Qualcomm has said that it wants domestic chip foundries to set up factories in the United States to circumvent the regulations that must purchase chips from the United States.
If this is a gesture of goodwill, then it can be said to be a trap in the context of American semiconductors beginning to investigate the dependence of American companies on the mainland's mature chip process. After all, Qualcomm really does all the good things and does the bad things, and it is not embarrassing to attract Chinese companies to set up factories in the United States. Thankfully, Qualcomm didn't"pits"For Chinese companies, this matter has come to an end.
Against this background, Qualcomm will once again help Indian semiconductor companies. It is reported that the company will help India set up a semiconductor company on its territory, create a new Qualcomm design center, and expand its presence in the Indian market.
Many people disagree with Qualcomm's move, after all, at this juncture, India obviously regards us as a direct competitor. And Qualcomm's move has a lot of meaning for them. But in my opinion, it's quite the opposite. Perhaps, this also means that the position of Chinese companies in India has been reversed.
I think everyone knows that India basically sees a lot of Chinese companies as a thorn in the side. Not only does it strictly review the investment of Chinese companies in India, but if they refuse to pass the investment approval, they also find someone to detain their hats. At the same time, the ban on personal computers has also been applied to China's ** chain. In addition, various censorship and confiscation incidents have all proved without exception that our enterprises are not having a good time in the Indian market.
Most people are advising Chinese companies to abandon the Indian market. But in my opinion, why? **The chain is built, and the treachery will not cross the bridge. It's like in a company, people don't want to compensate and keep forcing you to go. It was painful to leave, but I didn't get a penny that I should have received. If you go, it means that you have to give up the ** chain that has been established, not just give up the huge market share.
You only see the gains, but you don't see the local dissatisfaction with Chinese companies in India. For example, when the export data of iPhone products from India's local manufacturing industry skyrocketed, they began to accuse Chinese companies of not making any contribution but only occupying their market, but not contributing to India's manufacturing exports. Truth be told, what they want is to expand"Made in India"But the bias of Chinese companies does not match their original intentions, and may not be in line with their original intentions in the future.
Of course, there is no denying that this is a dire situation. But Qualcomm is different, and what is Qualcomm working with? Mobile phone manufacturers in our country are busy, and they go to the Indian market not to help, but to make money. Especially in the context of Chinese mobile phone manufacturers occupying such a large market share in India, they have no way to give up the situation of cooperating with Chinese companies. This gives us a chance.
For now, it is not good for India to give Qualcomm face, and in order to stabilize Qualcomm's so much investment, it is not good for them to cooperate with its hard-hitting objects. Really, what's the point of Qualcomm investing there if the company is withdrawn? Is it simply because of the low cost? Don't forget, cost and market demand go hand in hand. That's why I just said that maybe Qualcomm's new additional investment could subvert the position of Chinese mobile phone manufacturers.
What do you think? Feel free to leave a message, like and share!