Recently, the first-instance verdict of the corruption nest case of the Chinese Football Association, which shocked China and foreign countries, was concluded. Looking at the former chairman of the Football Association Chen Xuyuan, who was once powerful and now like a lost dog, standing in the defendant's dock, he couldn't help but sigh in his heart.
What exactly did he do? How long will he be sentenced? Why does football repeatedly embark on the path of corruption? With the gradual development of the trial work, it is believed that everything will fall into place.
After shouting for so many years of high-pressure anti-corruption, fighting many tigers and swatting countless flies, I have to say that the Commission for Discipline Inspection has worked hard and made great achievements. In order to support the anti-corruption efforts of the Discipline Inspection Commission, the state has transferred the "anti-corruption and anti-blasphemy" function of the procuratorial organs to the Discipline Inspection Commission, and at the same time has expanded the scale of the establishment of the Discipline Inspection Commission several times. However, in this high-pressure situation, corruption is still like an appendage, and it is difficult to **. The reasons for this are thought-provoking.
Some people have suggested that the discipline inspection commissions should be managed vertically and operated independently, so as to reduce the interference of local party and government leaders in the handling of cases by the discipline inspection commissions. At the same time, we will vigorously use young cadres of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, who have not yet been polluted by the customs and dare to uphold principles and challenge authority.
Such advice may be useful, but it will undoubtedly lead to new problems. One question is who will supervise the Commission for Discipline Inspection? After the discipline inspection commission is vertically managed, it is indeed possible to handle cases freely, but such a large team with absolute power will most likely lead to new corruption. Therefore, it is also necessary to strengthen supervision over the discipline inspection commissions at the same time, so that they will fall into an unsolvable circle.
Another problem is that after the independent operation, it is difficult to grasp the supervisory role of the discipline inspection commission. If the supervisors are too weak, people will exceed the authority of the law and there will be problems of violating laws and disciplines. However, if the supervision of the discipline inspection commission is too strong, there will again be a situation of overkill, and everyone will tremble, preferring to do less than do more, and adhere to the principle of doing less and making fewer mistakes. Therefore, we need to balance the intensity of supervision and the impartiality of handling cases.
Obviously, vertical pipes and independent operation are not a panacea for solving the current anti-corruption problem, and anti-corruption is destined to be a long-term and arduous task. At present, the discipline inspection commission system is carrying out education and rectification, which is very similar to the education and rectification of the political and legal contingent two years ago. This is because supervisors and law enforcers must be tough themselves in order to be able to handle cases impartially, otherwise what qualifications and positions do they have to oppose the corruption of others?
Do you think the Commission for Discipline Inspection needs to be vertically managed and run independently? Keep an eye out for exchanges and discussions.