Many big V authors on the self-**, within a certain range, they are more non-stop to publish their various opinions, narrating various latest issues, but rarely talk about the rights and wrongs of their cognition, nor do they discuss the rights and wrongs of a problem, that is, as soon as possible and quickly repeat the latest contact reports, but do not talk about solving problems, or preventing problems, just narrating a problem before and after, and not talking about people and things related to the problem. It's just like a part of a narrative essay that begins with a description of the time, place, cause and effect, but it's not like a professional talking about it, talking about how to solve the problem, no.
So what they want to do is to quickly grasp what's going on, what is striking, and then retell it, basically the same as the original article, and through the headline, some sentence structure, to make such an article have some sensational feeling.
Many people who like these **people, **big V, often don't know what these **people mean. And these big Vs hardly have any contact with the fans who like them, and they will not interact. Because interaction is an open process, and they don't want or like to make public what they don't want or don't like, and they don't want to disclose something that everyone knows or doesn't know.
Therefore, many fans don't know what the big V means from beginning to end, and fans don't think about their own practices, how much meaning there is, the biggest significance in the current self-** is that everyone and the same long-term consensus of the self form a circle of the same values, discuss problems, from food, clothing, housing and transportation to the overall situation, and promote progress. The atmosphere is more normal and better in the circle, and it can be more open.