Recently, NATO launched a high-profile operation, directing Ukraine to carry out air strikes, and it is under NATO's powerful technical equipment and flexible tactical command that Ukraine's air force can show its edge in this strike. It is reported that under the coordinated command of 1 RQ-4 "Global Hawk" large reconnaissance UAV and 1 P-8A "Poseidon" anti-submarine patrol aircraft, Ukraine dispatched 6 Su-24M bombers and 3 MiG-29 fighters to carry out precision air strikes on targets involving the Crimea region. This operation fully demonstrated NATO's superiority and potential in the tactical commanding heights, and laid the groundwork for subsequent military confrontations.
Expansion: As a world-class military organization, NATO has always been known for its excellent technical equipment and superb tactical command. This time, NATO commanded Ukraine to dispatch warplanes and elite troops to carry out air strikes, highlighting its outstanding features. Under the command of NATO, the actions of the Ukrainian Air Force are like a command, showing the ability to operate efficiently and cooperatively. There was no sloppiness in the whole process of the operation, and it demonstrated the professional level of NATO's international command. Ukraine's air strikes have made full use of NATO's military charm and demonstrated its strong strength in high-tech warfare.
As the main force under the command of NATO, the Ukrainian Air Force showed a high degree of precision strike capability in this air strike, skillfully using ADM-160MALD air-launched decoy shells to lure the Russian air defense system to expose its weaknesses, and then launched targeted strikes. From target reconnaissance to the implementation of air strikes, the Ukrainian Air Force has shown superb tactical literacy and execution capabilities, which caught the Russian army off guard. Although there are disputes over the results of the battle in the announcements issued by the two sides, from the actual results, the Ukrainian air strikes have had a significant impact on the Crimea region, the Crimean bridge has been blocked, and road traffic has been seriously disrupted, showing the substantial effect of the Ukrainian air strikes.
Expanding: The Ukrainian Air Force demonstrated remarkable strike accuracy and tactical flexibility in this airstrike. Using the accurate intelligence provided by aerial reconnaissance drones and anti-submarine patrol aircraft, the Ukrainian Air Force responded quickly, chose the right time and method of attack, and launched precision strikes. Through ingenious tactics and rapid response, the Ukrainian Air Force effectively eliminated the target and created a major problem for the Russian army. Throughout the course of the strike, the command coordination and combat execution of the Ukrainian Air Force showed a high level, showing the superiority of NATO's advanced tactics.
Although there is often a misunderstanding about NATO's strength, and that its strength lies in the hard confrontation of military power, this is not the case. NATO's real advantage lies in its technological equipment and operational and tactical command capabilities, which enable NATO to have a clear advantage in high-tech warfare. In this air raid operation in Ukraine under its command, NATO showed its advantages in professional command and advanced equipment, and the Russian army could not resist in front of it. This also shows that NATO's superiority in military technology and tactical application is unshakable.
Expand: NATO's strength is not only reflected in hard confrontation, but also in its superb command capability and advanced technology and equipment. NATO, with its unique tactical strength and sophisticated command system, has made war execution more effective. In this Ukrainian air raid, NATO's command excellence and tacit cooperation made the entire operation appear coherent and efficient. Compared with Russia and other countries, NATO's technology and equipment are in a leading position, and it has a greater chance of winning the competition of high-tech military equipment.
Compared with NATO, although Russia retains a certain military size, there is a clear gap with NATO in terms of technical equipment and tactical command. Especially in terms of high-tech equipment and advanced strikes, Russia is constrained by bottlenecks in production and renewal speed, which puts it at a disadvantage in modern warfare. Although Russia's military strength should not be underestimated, it still has the dilemma of being unable to succeed, which also gives NATO an advantage in confrontation. NATO's technological strength and comprehensive capabilities have sounded the alarm for Russia and laid the groundwork for future military reforms.
Expansion: Although the Russian military has a certain size, it is significantly behind NATO in terms of technical equipment and tactical command. Russia's challenge lies in its shortcomings in modern military equipment and means of strike. Although the Russian army still maintains a certain military reserve, its follow-up capability is not enough to meet the needs of modern warfare. The Russian army needs to be strengthened in terms of tactical execution and equipment updating. Compared with NATO's highly advanced technology and equipment, Russia must accelerate reform and modernization in future military challenges in order to compete with NATO.
NATO has commanded Ukraine to launch air strikes, demonstrating its unique superiority in military technology and tactical command. The Ukrainian Air Force, under the command of NATO, successfully launched effective air strikes on the Crimea region using advanced equipment and precision strikes. At the same time, Russia has exposed problems in its technical equipment and follow-up capabilities in the face of NATO's high-tech warfare, and although it retains a certain military strength, it is difficult to compete with NATO. With regard to future military confrontations, technological strength and comprehensive capability will become even more important topics to be discussed in front of all quarters. The confrontation between NATO and the Russian military has undoubtedly provided a useful reference for the renewal of modern military mechanisms and tactics, and has also led to new developments and changes in the military field of various countries.