A health care product store in Xi'an was fined 1.5 million yuan by the Market Supervision Bureau for selling 13 boxes of "Wan Aike" without a license with a sales amount of 975 yuan. Let's walk into this hot event together.
Viagra is also called "Viagra", and the drug is called sildenafil citrate, also known as PDE-5 inhibitor, and its main effect is male erectile dysfunction (ED), which is what we call impotence. It is produced by Pfizer in the United States, the first one of the most impotence drugs on the market, and the lasting effect of the drug can reach 4-5 hours. The main function of Viagra is to make the cavernous body congested, the main function is to inhibit weakness, and it is a common drug for erectile dysfunction. The drug is able to improve the symptoms of erectile function and increase the hardness of erection.
The newly revised Drug Administration Law of the People's Republic of China was officially implemented on December 1, 2019, which makes clear penalties for the sale of drugs without a license - Article 115 of the Drug Administration Law of the People's Republic of China: If a drug is produced or sold without obtaining a drug production license, a drug business license or a preparation license for a medical institution, it shall be ordered to close down, confiscate the illegally produced and sold drugs and illegal gains, and impose a penalty on illegal production, a fine of not less than 15 times but not more than 30 times the value of the drugs sold (including sold and unsold drugs); If the value of the goods is less than 100,000 yuan, it shall be calculated as 100,000 yuan.
"Viagra", although it is a type of Viagra, is a prescription drug. The health care product store is selling without a license, and the health care product actively refunded consumers after the case to eliminate the harmful consequences of the illegal acts, and the product involved in the case was not taken, and the social harm was small, and the minimum fine was 1.5 million yuan.
The high fines exceed the penalty limits for the offence itself. Violation of the principle of over-punishment of administrative punishment. It should be corrected and the fine should be changed to $50,000.
How much do you think the penalty should be imposed in this case? Leave your valuable views in the comment area.