It is very responsible to appoint private teachers for a specific period of time. In particular, in the case of poor and middle-class peasant management schools, the family composition of the private teachers must be poor peasants. It is worth mentioning that the private teachers recruited by the production brigade must pass an examination, and the commune also often screens them by examination, and if they fail to pass the examination, they will be dismissed at the time. Later, the "one-size-fits-all" removal, how could there be "unqualified" people? It was also slandered as "elimination"?
When it comes to the regularization of private teachers, it is not that some people say that "only those who are qualified are regularized". It can be said that there are twists and turns in turning positive, and it is not a matter of course to be able to turn positive. Isn't it? At the beginning, it was an internal recruitment, and you had to be admitted to a normal school first, and you could only be directly turned into a regular after the two-year study period expired. In the following years, only those who are within the teaching deadline (i.e., private teachers in the plan) can be directly converted through the examination. Of course, it is also mixed with the direct transfer of "examination" into the "normal" graduation of the civilian education class.
In the last year of survival of private teachers, the examination is the formality, and the teaching deadline stipulated by the local government is the "hardware". This time, there was a big fight, and the introduction of the "zero" policy for private teachers, all those who are within the teaching deadline, as long as they are on the job, will all be regularized. It is inevitable that there will be those who have become "private teachers" by virtue of their connections, and there are also those who have tampered with the teaching deadline by virtue of their connections, and they are suspected of becoming regular teachers by "fishing in troubled waters".
In the end, those who did not become regular were not within the teaching deadline, nor did they have certain relationships or connections, and in some places they were changed their "titles" to "substitute teachers". The reason why they are still called former private teachers is that many of them did not really teach after the teaching deadline, but that the so-called teaching deadline came too late - the "red line" that appeared after a few years of teaching made the fate of private teachers "double heavens". The so-called latecomers, that is, non-"private teachers", were beaten into the "cold palace" and were tragically dismissed.
Whether or not private teachers are regularized cannot be generalized. It is not possible to conclude that the coffin is "unqualified". There is always a tortuous process in the emergence and disappearance of anything, the development and outcome of anything. Private teachers who have become regular teachers do have a few points in the two subjects together, and those who cannot be turned into regular teachers will definitely get good results, and the teaching effect is not bad, but there is a lack of an "opportunity".
Anyone who looks down on the former private teachers who are now talking about it, and those substitute teachers. It is undeniable that they are all former "cadres of the township education office", or some private teachers who "steal the opportunity" to become regulars". When I was complacent, I didn't forget to piggyback a few words about the former private teachers and substitute teachers.
Boiled beans burn beans, and beans cry in the kettle. This is born from the same root, when is it urgent? "The grievances of the former private teachers can only be explained by the parties. Who knows, luck is sometimes an attitude - time! Fate! Dare to guarantee that there is no human factor in the operation? However, the remarks of a headline user make people more than angry.
"Turning is the king, not turning is scum. The whole society knows that private teachers are not real teachers. Twenty or thirty years ago, when the state began to rectify the ranks of private teachers, through the examination and assessment, the qualified teachers were turned into public teachers, and a very small number of unqualified private teachers with low education level were all eliminated, dismissed, expelled and sent home to farm, these people were kicked out of the teaching team, and they could no longer be allowed to stand on the podium and mislead people's children. This is the wise decision of the country, which is really happy!I was also a member of the former private teachers, and I was not a private teacher at that time. At that time, it was no longer "fashionable", and it was no longer the era of poor middle peasant management schools. After the first rectification of the ranks of private teachers in 1982, the cultural level of private teachers was even higher.
In 1984, the recruitment of private teachers in our county from the college entrance examination was the "main theme", and it was also the wise decision of the county party committee and the county. Those who passed the examination and were selected for admission had to undergo half-year training in the "Red School" at that time. During the training period, each person enjoys a living allowance of 25 yuan per month. It was said that there was a shortage of school buildings and a shortage of teachers, so the county's 10 townships (towns) were divided into two phases of training. As a result, the second phase of training did not start teaching until the following year, and became private teachers who were later outside the teaching deadline. Everyone said, is it wrong?
The vast majority of those who turned into regulars before the acceptance of the "Pujiu" are those with a high level of education and a strong level of business. They pass the exam, and the results determine the "people-to-government" policy. There are very few "direct transfers", because the starting point is to win provincial commendations and awards, and the possibility of "human factors" is not ruled out, but there must also be a certain amount of teaching experience and position (general teachers can't be evaluated, only those who serve as principals in schools).
Many private teachers with real talents and real learning cannot participate in the "people-to-public" examination because they are outside the deadline set by various localities. As everyone knows, the deadline for teaching did not exist when he was a private teacher, and no one told him, and there was already a definition of the number of years that could not be turned into a regular teacher.
Presumably, many private teachers, like me, think that "as long as they become private teachers, they will definitely be able to become regular teachers in the future", but they are confused, and they have been working for one or two decades. Some of them are still ambitious, fighting on the three-foot podium. I have to say that the conversion of private teachers to regular teachers has indeed buried many elites, and those who have not been regularized are also backbones.