In the past ten years, under the slaughter of capital, more than 100 million "leftover women" have emerged in China!
This figure may be shocking, because in our daily reports, we often hear that there are more than 30 million male singles in China, and it seems that men are at a disadvantage in the marriage market.
However, the flip side of the truth is that more than 100 million women in China struggle to find a suitable partner. Have you ever wondered why capital is reluctant to touch on this phenomenon of "leftover women"? If you're confused about this, you might as well continue to listen to my analysis.
Before the 80s of the last century, American capitalists faced a major challenge: the long-term stagflation environment led to a sluggish willingness to spend, and the savings rate continued to rise.
This poses a serious threat to the interests of the capitalists, prompting them to collectively seek solutions.
After in-depth discussions, they came to a consensus: in order to achieve profitable growth, the first task is to change people's consumption attitudes.
Since the 80s, consumerism has been promoted in the United States and television, and advertising slogans have emerged: women should buy designer bags to invest in themselves, men should deserve more luxurious cars, and the expression of love is to give away diamonds. Do these slogans sound familiar to you?
Let me elaborate on it for you. Through this subtle propaganda, young people in the United States quickly shifted from frugal savings to over-reliance on credit cards.
At the beginning of the 21st century, Americans' savings rate fell sharply to 19%, almost all the money in the pocket.
I tell this story because similar situations have been remade in China. China's accession to the WTO in 2001 attracted an influx of more than one trillion yuan of foreign capital, and at the same time, consumerism followed.
However, according to the research of overseas institutions, China at that time did not have the basis to promote consumerism. The reason is simple, most Chinese at that time were still facing the problem of food and clothing, and the per capita income was only a few hundred yuan, making it difficult to afford the consumption of non-essential goods.
It was not until the brilliant success of the 2008 Beijing Olympics that China's economy ushered in a period of rapid development, and the level of people's wealth increased significantly, and then capital began to carefully plan its layout.
At first, they advertised indiscriminately, and both men and women encouraged consumption. For example, men are encouraged to be kind to themselves and buy good cars; For women, it is emphasized that they deserve a more beautiful image, such as buying brand-name bags, ** jewelry and jewelry.
However, they soon discovered that this propaganda tactic did not work in China. Because China is an emerging economy, male consumers are quite rational in the field of consumption, and the advertising slogans launched by capital have little impact on them.
In view of China's unique consumption environment, Capital has strategically adjusted its market strategy. Since the male consumer group is relatively conservative, capital has begun to concentrate its firepower on attacking the female market.
Therefore, since around 2010, we have noticed that many new festivals have emerged online, such as White Day, Goddess Day, 520, and "the first cup of milk tea in autumn". The emergence of these festivals is not accidental, but the product of careful planning by capital.
Why is capital keen to create these festivals? The answer is actually very simple: the festival is just a front to induce consumers to spend, and its real purpose is to stimulate women's desire to shop, thereby driving consumption growth and bringing huge profits to capital.
However, there is a problem that cannot be ignored here: female consumers in China have relatively limited financial resources. Frequently push them to spend through festivals**, and soon they may face financial difficulties.
In order to solve this dilemma, capital quickly turned its attention to the group of men who were addicted to games on the sidelines. Note that capital is not trying to convince men to consume, what they really value is the wealth in the hands of men.
They know that it is almost impossible to induce men to consume simply through advertising slogans. The only thing that can really touch men is the woman next to them.
Therefore, since the 2010s, there have been all kinds of magical classics on the Internet, for example, women should be kind to themselves, love her should give her cards, men are responsible for making money to support their families, and women are responsible for being beautiful like flowers.
The core purpose of these remarks is to make women feel that spending money is a natural thing, and to make men feel that spending money on women is a universal truth.
As long as these two goals are achieved, capital will form a perfect closed loop of harvesting:
1. Create an excuse for women to spend on festivals.
2. In the name of festivals, men are asked to transfer money or shop for women.
3. After getting the money, women immediately go to major platforms to shop.
Fourth, the capital has made money, and then take the money to carry out ** publicity.
Of course, in this harvesting process, there will inevitably be some hard bones, some men just insist on the festival without any action, for this kind of group, what will capital do? 
The answer is to increase propaganda and morally disparage such people. Let them have no place to be ashamed of themselves, and can only be forced to pay money.
The most typical case is to call those who do not transfer money or give gifts during the holidays "straight men", saying that they cannot provide emotional value to women and deserve to be single for the rest of their lives. Through this precise attack, this group of men can reflect on themselves and force them to act on the festival, thus forming a herd effect, making it a natural thing to transfer money to women on the Goddess Day.
Of course, blindly belittling men will not work, after all, even if men are willing to transfer money, women must be willing to accept it. If all the women are independent individuals and insist on not taking a penny from the men, then the harvest plan will not go smoothly.
So in addition to criticizing men, at the same time, we have to praise women, so that women can feel at ease that collecting money on holidays is the right thing to do. So we found that a girl from an ordinary family would be called a "little fairy", while a boy from an ordinary family would be called a "poor dick".
In this way, once compared, it makes it a reasonable thing for men to kneel and lick, and it also makes it natural for women to collect money. After all, the fairy charges you a little money, which is to look up to you.
If there are men who will question it in this process, then there will be more than 30 million men The news is repeatedly mentioned, and the subtext is: You think about it, you don't want to spend money on me, and there are more than 30 million back-ups waiting to replace you.
By amplifying anxiety in this way, in the end, many men can only be forced to give in, and many women have become complacent in the slaughter of capital, and they gradually begin to lose themselves and cannot see themselves clearly.
When choosing a mate, I always feel that the people around me are not worthy of me, and only those rich second generations or reasonable nobles can enter their own eyes. This high standard has directly caused the number of single women to rise sharply, and in just 10 years, there are more than 100 million leftover women in China.
In all fairness, are these 100 million women really unable to get married? Of course not, in an environment where there are more men and fewer women, as long as women are willing, they can always find a home.
The reason why they remain single is simply because the standards are too high, and there are very few men who meet their requirements.
So on the surface, it is true that there are more men and fewer women, but in fact, whether it is a blind date market or an online blind date**, there are often more women than men.
It's just that such news will not be reported, and capital will not invest money to publicize the fact that there are 100 million leftover women, because deepening women's anxiety will only make the "licking dog economy" die quickly, thereby reducing the profits obtained by capital.
That group of lepre-like capitalists, they never do anything bad for themselves.
Thank you for your likes + attention, enter *** to get more exciting content!