Pet dogs cannot be given quasi national treatment

Mondo Pets Updated on 2024-03-05

Pet dog injuries often occur, and I swiped another ** report in the morning, and the following is a screenshot.

I remember there was a previous report that a dog bit a man, and in the fight, the dog ***, the dog owner took the man to court, and the man was judged to be overly defensive. At that time, I was very angry, and in my comments I scolded the lawyer who raised the excessive defense as a dog lawyer, and the judge who convicted the excessive defense as a dog judge, arguing that they regarded the dog as a "national of the People's Republic of China".

I believe that most people understand that excessive defense is the relationship between the person who is violated and the person who commits the violation, the dog is not a person, it is a thing, it is the property of the dog owner, and to use excessive defense to fight a lawsuit for a dog is to treat the dog as a person, and to defend the dog with the laws of the People's Republic of China is to treat the dog as a citizen of the People's Republic of China, which is very undesirable and is a slander against the title of "national". We should never give any non-human animal the status of "national" or "quasi-national", what about giant pandas? National treasure! Pets of the people of the country! Nor did it give it the status of a citizen.

Legal resources are tight, and our lawyers, judges, and police should not waste their time fighting lawsuits for dogs.

Related Pages