The results of CNKI's two duplicate checks are inconsistent, which is a problem that many academic authors may encounter when submitting for plagiarism checking. Plagiarism checking, in short, is to compare the content through a special software system to detect whether there is plagiarism or duplication. When the results of CNKI are different twice, it may be caused by database updates, algorithm adjustments, or differences in the format of submissions.
In the face of this situation, the author should first ensure that the ** version of each submission is consistent, so as to avoid differences in the plagiarism check results due to different formats. Secondly, you can understand the specific principles and standards of CNKI duplicate checking, and check your own ** against each other to see if there are any parts that may be misjudged as duplicates, such as whether the citation format is correct. If you still have questions, you may wish to contact CNKI's customer service or technical support directly for professional answers and help.
In academic research, plagiarism checking is a very important job, which is related to academic integrity and academic quality. If an article is found to have plagiarism or duplicate the list, it will not only affect the author's academic reputation, but also may lead to serious consequences such as being retracted. Therefore, the author should pay attention to originality and avoid plagiarism and plagiarism when writing.
At the same time, we also need to realize that any plagiarism checking system is not a panacea, and they can only be used as an auxiliary tool to help us find problems in **. True academic integrity and academic quality also depend on the consciousness and efforts of every scholar. Only when we truly respect academics and originality can we jointly create a healthy and good academic environment.
Returning to the problem of inconsistency between the two duplicate checks on CNKI, the author does not need to panic too much when encountering this situation. Through careful inspection, communication and consultation, and active improvement, I believe that we will be able to find the crux of the problem, and finally get an accurate and fair duplicate check result. After all, the original intention of CNKI and other plagiarism checking systems is to promote the healthy development of academics, as long as we treat each plagiarism check with integrity and rigor, we will be able to go further and more stable on the academic road.