The German Chancellor s betrayal of Britain Why the Storm Shadow was fought accurately was all u

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-03-05

France's Macron's remarks about sending troops have been hotly discussed, and recently, German Chancellor Scholz revealed an unknown fact: Britain has actually secretly deployed ground combat troops in Ukraine, a move that he described as "Storm Shadow" missile-like precision, but accompanied by a metaphor of betrayal.

The turmoil has complicated and delicate international relations.

The UK's ** hand:'Storm Shadow'The key to a precise missile strike in the Black Sea is inseparable from the assistance of the British side. It is like a precise ruler, thanks to the subtle game and information transfer of internal allies.

If this subtle containment is detected by Russia, I am afraid that it will ignite new hostility. In fact, Britain is even ahead of the United States in Russia's strategic horizon and in the sequence of nuclear strikes, imagine that if the situation were reversed, the first blow might start in London and then in Washington. "

Britain is now in an awkward position, with Russia seeing it as its primary target. When Germany tried to shift responsibility, its intentions were not unclear. Schultz made it clear that he would not provide it"Taurus"This powerful ** with a range of 500 km, hints at the potential impact of an attack on bridges.

Once"Taurus"Really touching the bridge, Zelensky's vision of 2024 may face challenges. It is worth pondering how such a move will affect Russia's and Putin's views on Germany.

As for"Nord Stream"The truth of the pipeline is well known to all parties. Germany's support for Ukraine seems to be a little under-emboldened, and the mentality against Russia is even more wavering.

Face"Pig teammates"He hopes to reduce his burden by transferring the conflict to the UK. In the current international situation, Britain has become Russia's primary strategic rival.

With Macron's tough stance, France could become a secondary target for Russia. And if Germany chooses to sit on the sidelines, offering aid but vacillating in its attitude, it may be able to get away with becoming a third option that Russia ignores.

Behind Scholz's words, a strategy is revealed: if more Western countries support Ukraine in the form of materials rather than direct troops, it can not only have a substantial impact, but also show Russia our position - we do not directly participate in the war, but only provide ** support.

Although"Leopard 2"All the tanks were defeated, but not a single officer in our phalanx was lost to the front. If it had been controlled by my soldiers, perhaps the battle would not have been so awkward. As the US spokesman said, the loss of the M1 tank stemmed from the fact that the operator was a Ukrainian rather than an American.

This kind of covert shirking of responsibility is not uncommon, but there are significant differences in the West's attitude towards sending troops to aid Ukraine. Despite Macron's purported thoughtful decision, it now appears that countries do not fully support it.

Some countries have acted quietly but are afraid, like Scholz, by exposing the behavior of other countries, as if to incite hostility in order to reduce their own pressure.

As Russia's invasion of Ukraine comes to an end, a crucial choice arises: How do countries reshape their relationship with Russia? What are the prospects for European-Russian cooperation in the post-conflict era?

There may be a sign of peace in 2024, and if that happens, dialogue will be inevitable. A ceasefire is not only a cessation of hostilities, but also the beginning of a new chapter in dialogue.

For those countries that have fully supported Ukraine, there will be significant considerations about how to conspire with Russia for the future after reconciliation. Countries are planning ahead, as Scholz reveals the true intentions of their allies, showing that they are also planning a buffer strategy for the post-conflict era.

As the new era dawns, the strategic thinking of countries will determine the direction of the future.

Many countries need to learn an important lesson from this: excessive favoritism towards Ukraine in the Russia-Ukraine situation may accumulate irreconcilable contradictions with Russia in the future.

Related Pages