Recently, Jining Fire gave an anti-fraud offer to Lao Chen but was complained about, which caused heated discussions in the society. As a former anti-fraud policeman, the problem of anti-fraud Lao Chen's misconduct in the live broadcast has attracted widespread attention.
This raises a question about the ethics of public officials:Is morality important or traffic first?
Is the anti-fraud Lao Chen's misconduct in the live broadcast really suitable for being a public official? Is the flow of public officials higher than morality? Or the view that morality is more important than the pursuit of traffic.
Judging from the ** clip, after Lao Chen connected to the female anchor, his speech seemed to be described as "not very elegant".
Lao Chen first ridiculed the female anchor that there were few people in the live broadcast room, but he couldn't pk him, and then the female anchor had more viewers, but he clenched his fists with both hands to the chest, saying that the female anchor relied on "this power" to win him.
This is not over, the female anchor in the back asked Lao Chen to perform a talent, and Lao Chen blurted out that his talent was "bragging".
What else can braggart be? Soon Lao Chen demonstrated the beauty anchor, only to see that he was clenching his fists against his chest again.
This time, he said that he was even more outrageous, he said that the female anchor "That (breast) is what he blew out, fake." ”
Although Lao Chen is no longer a police officer, it is not appropriate to act like a public figure.
There are also old brothers who don't talk much, and bluntly said that "Lao Chen is not an honest person".
Let's analyze the specific behavior of anti-fraud Lao Chen in the live broadcast and its impact. According to reports, the anti-fraud Lao Chen has insulted women in the live broadcast. This kind of behavior not only damages its own image, but also affects the audience's trust in its anti-fraud propaganda.
As a former public official, he should lead by example and set a good moral example, rather than disregarding his image and bottom line for the sake of traffic.
When we talk about the ethical standards that should be expected of professional workers, we are actually a group of people who have been entrusted with the responsibility of managing public resources, formulating and enforcing policies, and serving the public. Therefore, the ethical standards of public officials not only require them to comply with laws and regulations, but also require them to demonstrate a high level of responsibility, impartiality, integrity, and dedication in their daily work.
The professional ethics standards of public officials are multifaceted, and they require public officials not only to abide by the law in their daily work, but also to continuously pursue higher ethical standards in order to achieve the maximum service to the public and the maximization of the public interest. These standards are not only the requirements for the personal character of public officials, but also the expectations for their role as public servants of the state and society. By upholding and improving these ethical standards, public officials can contribute to a more fair, transparent, and efficient system. As public service providers in society, public officials should have a high sense of responsibility and professionalism. They should act in the public interest, uphold professional ethics, be honest and trustworthy, and be honest and honest in their official duties. In terms of information dissemination, public officials should follow the principles of objectivity, truthfulness and impartiality, refrain from disseminating false information, and refrain from abusing their positions and powers for personal gain. Only in this way can we establish a good professional image and win the trust and support of the public.
In fact, after leaving the job, Lao Chen did not hesitate to adopt vulgar and exaggerated means to conduct live broadcasts in order to pursue click-through rates and attention. This kind of behavior is not suitable for the moral image of public officials, such as being a role model for public office propaganda, and it also sets a bad moral example for the public.
There are different views on traffic and morality in society. Some people believe that traffic is the only criterion for measuring the publicity influence of a public official, and only high traffic can bring greater publicity influence and social value.
However, this view ignores an important fact:Traffic is not the only evaluation criterion, but also morality. The character of a public official determines whether his words and deeds are in line with the values of society and whether he can set a good example for the public.
If a Jining fire department ignores morality in pursuit of traffic, it will only lose the trust and support of the public in the end.
Jining Fire Protection should take the public interest as the starting point and set a good moral example. Only in this way can we truly bring into play the social value of public officials and win the trust and support of the public.