During the Russia-Ukraine conflict, many people sang about Russia, believing that Russia might not be able to withstand the Western alliance and would soon collapse. But the war has been fought for more than two years, and Russia has not only withstood the Western coalition forces, but even fought more and more in an orderly manner, and the front has been constantly compressing towards western Ukraine.
In the eyes of the outside world, Russia is not fighting beautifully, but it is very resilient, which is the characteristic of the Russian army, some people say that the Russian army is similar to the Soviet army back then, it belongs to the slow-burning type, and the power of the latter strike is very strong.
The victory or defeat of the war contains many factors, and one or two battles fought beautifully do not represent the victory or defeat of the entire war, and the key is who is the winner in the end. The factors that determine the outcome of a war include not only the combat effectiveness of the army, but also the number of equipment, and many factors related to the country, such as energy, science and technology, food and many other potentials.
Russia has a huge war potential, it has to have energy, and it can export a lot of grain every year, and it has no problem fighting for 10 years. If it is meaningless to simply look at the details of the battle, whether it is fought beautifully or not, the key is who can achieve the greatest combat effectiveness and win the war.
In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, there is no eye-catching equipment, even if Ukraine uses American tanks and German Leopard tanks, not only did they not exert their power, but they were even disabled when they entered the field, and some were captured by the Russian army.
In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, drones have become a commonly used ** equipment. If UAVs are the best equipment, in fact, they are not strictly speaking, many UAVs in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict are civilian UAVs that have been modified and played the role of armed UAVs after loading ammunition.
In the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it was found that many UAVs were a certain type of civilian UAV produced in China. No wonder the United States accuses China of supplying Russia with **.
In fact, China is very wronged and does not supply military drones at all, but the warring parties buy civilian drones of our production from the international market.
From foreign social sources, it can be seen that the Russian army used an advanced detection equipment on the battlefield of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, which is said to be able to detect Ukrainian drones, known as the "spectrum detection analyzer".
Don't think that this is the best equipment of the Russian army, it is said that it is also a civilian analyzer produced in southern China, an instrument mainly used for the maintenance of telecommunications base stations, to detect whether electronic components are normal, and it is also used in railways, and it is also used for detection and analysis in other scientific and technological fields.
Why does Russia use such a civilian instrument as China?
It can detect all kinds of signals, so it can also be used in the military, and drones are also civilian, so why can't civilian detectors be used?
According to the information written by a big V on the Internet, Russia imports a large amount of Chinese civilian equipment through the Ministry of Commerce, and even questions it, believing that some Chinese civilian equipment exported to Russia has military functions.
Is this person an internal ghost, or is he providing information for the United States?
What kind of instruments does Russia use, can he interpret it in depth, does he want to tell the Americans that China has provided ** to Russia?
But we also have to see that there is a lot of market for civilian drones, which are easy to buy. As for how Russia and Ukraine bought it and how it was modified, that was their business and had nothing to do with China.
According to the data, a combat control system used by Ukraine is also installed on computers and mobile phones produced in China. Russia also imported a Chinese civilian all-terrain vehicle.
It can be seen from the ** information that China's production of this civilian all-terrain vehicle is very small, and it is also called the civilian version of the "Bobcat".
Whether civil or military, after the war starts, everything that is conducive to the war can be used.
However, judging from the civilian drones and civilian Bobcat terrain vehicles imported by Russia and Ukraine, China's civilian equipment is very advanced, not only for military use, but even for some professional military equipment.
It can also be seen that with the development of China, China has great potential for war. In the future, we can also use it for military purposes.
*The information also revealed that the PLA is also equipped with some advanced equipment, but it is impossible to equip it all.
If we were to go to war, would we be able to turn on the machines and ensure a steady flow of civilian equipment to equip the PLA?
There are two issues that need to be clarified here:
The first is to provide equipment for China, which must be different from the civilian version. After all, some civilian equipment has already been exported abroad, and hostile countries must understand the parameters and will strike at China's civilian equipment.
Second, after the outbreak of war, it is necessary to stop dealing with unfriendly countries and prevent them from being used in military conflicts. Even if civilian equipment is exported to other countries, it must be of an exclusive nature, otherwise our war potential will not be effective.
The decisive factor in war is man.
The quality of the Chinese population is also a powerful war potential, and equipment is operated by people, and how to transform equipment into combat effectiveness also depends on people.
Although our population is aging and not as young as India, our war potential is still strong.
Judging from our response to the suppression of the United States and the West and the process of cross-strait reunification, we have strong public support, which is also a powerful war potential.
The demographic advantage is unlikely to last long.
Now that our population has declined, and we have entered an aging society, even if the state encourages childbearing, but in the face of many factors, the number of births is declining, which has a reducing effect on our future population advantage.
The population issue is a scientific issue, and there are many objective factors that have brought us to the present, and some of them have arisen under the infiltration of the West.
The country's progress and development depend on people, not because the population is small, and the per capita GDP is high, so that the country can develop.
It is urgent to solve this problem, and we have made efforts in this regard, such as encouraging childbearing, and excluding factors that affect people's desire to have children, etc., but to really return to the era of wanting to have children and having more children, there needs to be a process, but the human potential, the United States will not be able to catch up for a while. Even Russia, a country with a declining population, still scares the entire West, not to mention China.
The war potential is both intangible and tangible.
In the past, it was always thought that war was fought with energy, and it was difficult to sustain without energy.
This is only one aspect, and if the difficulties of war are magnified, it is easy to arouse fear of war. In addition, the "American-phobic theory" spread by the inner ghosts infiltrated by the United States will give rise to the theory that "the United States is invincible," which will also affect the development of war potential.
The most important thing about the war potential is to solve the psychological problems of good people.
We always say that Russia is a fighting nation, not that the Russians are aggressive, but that the Russians have a tenacious spirit, and without a tenacious national spirit, no matter how great the potential is, they will lose the war.
In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russian soldiers committed suicide by detonating a grenade after being wounded, embodying a national spirit of "I would rather die in battle than be a prisoner", and we also have this spirit.
Why does the United States provoke China and dare not have a direct showdown with China?
In fact, in the Sino-US contest, although China has shown that it does not want to fight, it is not afraid of fighting. Lao Mei has long seen China's strong national power, and this power has been reflected on the Internet.
Coupled with the development of our civilian science and technology, I am afraid that this is also something that the United States did not expect.
We play very clearly and try not to clash with other countries, but if our sovereignty is repeatedly violated, then China will not be polite.
The combat potential is strong and needs to be verified in the war. The United States continues to provoke cannon fodder, just to drag China into the war, after all, we are different from Russia and have not experienced war for a long time.
But if the United States suspects that China "does not dare to fight", then it can only wait until the time of war, when China gives full play to its potential and allows the United States to feel it.
network, the copyright belongs to the original author.