[New changes in Sino-US relations! From "decoupling" to "win-win cooperation", what is the key? 】
Recently, there has been a huge change in the attitude of the United States towards Sino-US relations! U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken had previously asked China to "put on the menu", but then the U.S. realized that China and the United States not only cannot "decouple", but need to jointly address the challenges of globalization. Does Clark, president of the American Chamber of Commerce, lead a delegation to China and accept China's super-standard reception, a move that marks the United States recognizing reality? Or is it buying time for the anti-Chinese struggle in the future? Let's take a look at the recent changes and trends in China-US relations.
First of all, US Ambassador to China Burns made a rare criticism of some voices advocating the "decoupling" of China and the United States, stressing that China and the United States cannot "divorce" because it will affect the dinner issue of hundreds of thousands of American families. This view reflects the ambassador's deep understanding of China-US relations, and also shows the urgency of improving China-US relations.
Second, U.S. Representative Tai Qi had a heated discussion with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao on the sidelines of the WTO Ministerial Meeting. Although Dai Qi is still reluctant to lift the tariffs, she also realizes that China and the United States cannot "decouple", and stressed the need for the two countries to continue to maintain communication and cooperation at the WTO.
From the "table menu theory" to "no divorce", the change in the attitude of the United States towards China is remarkable! Clark, president of the American Chamber of Commerce, led a delegation to China, and the US media said that this was the latest sign of improvement in relations between the two countries. But is there a deeper consideration behind this abrupt shift? We must be vigilant!
First, as the U.S. controls inflation, foreign capital may flood the Chinese market, but we must be wary of whether foreign capital is truly rooted or just a momentary speculative behavior. Regulation and prevention are essential.
Second, we must stabilize Hong Kong's position and give full play to its advantages as an international financial centre to cope with uncertainties in the international situation.
Third, it is also crucial to protect the safety of Chinese companies and Chinese companies listed in the United States. Despite the improvement in U.S.-China relations, the U.S.** has not abated in discrimination and sanctions against Chinese companies, and we must be ready to respond.
The economies of China and the United States are highly complementary, and win-win cooperation is the only right choice. However, the United States' obsession with hegemony is worrying, and we must be ready to respond and defend our national interests at all costs!
The direction of China-US relations is related to the global landscape, and we look forward to an open and cooperative attitude between the two sides to jointly address challenges and promote the stability and prosperity of the world economy.