"Article 20" is a film that has aroused widespread social attention, and through three cases, it has learned about the "justifiable defense" clause in the Criminal Law. The first case tells the story of Zhang Guisheng, a bus driver, who was convicted of intentional injury because of his courageous actions, and eventually died in a car accident. The second case is about Wang Yongqiang's legitimate defense after being bullied, which led to the victim's family demanding to pay for the murder. The third case involves prosecutor Han Ming's son being reported by the other party's father for witnessing school bullying, which may affect Han Yuchen's future.
The three cases involved different family backgrounds and involved issues of courage, justifiable self-defense and school bullying. The movie tells the axiom behind these cases from the perspective of small people. At the same time, the film also focuses on the cases of female victims, reflecting the difficulties faced by women in the family and workplace.
A classic line from the movie: "The law is to make it more expensive for bad people to commit crimes, not to make good people more expensive." "It provoked deep thought. Through this line, the film expresses its call for and support for legitimate defense, hoping that the law can better protect the brave and vulnerable.
On the Internet, Article 20 has aroused heated discussions. Many netizens expressed their deep agreement with the plot and themes in the movie, believing that the law should pay more attention to the principle of legitimate defense and give due support and protection to those who act bravely. Netizens also talked about their understanding and experience of justifiable defense, sharing similar cases and personal opinions.
The film sparked a discussion that focused not only on the issue of justifiable defense, but also on women's rights. The female victims appear particularly vulnerable and helpless in the cases in the film, which has caused netizens to discuss women's safety and rights. Many netizens called for the society to give more protection and support to women and reduce the occurrence of ** cases.
Compared with previous similar cases, the movie "Article 20" connects the stories of multiple cases, showing the problem of legitimate defense and the plight of female victims in more detail. It stresses that the law should protect vulnerable groups and those who act in the sense of justice, and give them due support and recognition. The film has sparked a reflection on law and social justice, and hopes to draw more attention to legitimate defense and women's rights.
So far, there is no update on the development of the incident. But the impact of this film on society cannot be ignored. It has sparked widespread public thinking and discussion about legitimate defense and women's rights, and has focused society's attention on these important issues. It is hoped that the film will spark more in-depth discussions and reforms, so that the law can better protect the vulnerable and courageous, and create a more just and equal society.
What do you think of the plot and themes in the movie "Article 20"? Do you agree that the law should do a better job of protecting the brave and vulnerable? Please leave your comments and discuss together.