Case.
For example, during the divorce of the husband and wife, the man will take a bunch of IOUs with his parents, saying that he borrowed them from his parents, but many judges are experienced, and the judges review them much stricter than ordinary private loansSeverely reprimanding the man is more likely to arrest him with a false lawsuitHowever, if the man writes such a sentence on the loan contract, the dispute over the IOU is under the jurisdiction of the arbitration committee, and then, the man and his parents go to the arbitration tribunal, one dares to ask, one dares to answer, one advocates something, and the other party agrees to all of them.
The arbitral tribunal will generally recognize the authenticity of the claim and debt if it does not involve material defects in the evidence.
Why choose arbitration over litigation? Because the arbitration is fast, and the arbitration is a final adjudication, and there is no appeal after the arbitration, the husband and his parents sang a duet in the arbitral tribunal, and the spouse who did not recognize this was not even qualified to be present, because the woman was not the respondent, and an effective arbitration document could have the same effect of simulating facts as the judgment.
Therefore, when returning to the court and making a divorce, one party claims that the fact of borrowing does not exist, and the other party immediately shoots out an effective arbitration document, slapping a judicially recognized iron fact in front of the woman's eyes, unless the woman's evidence can also deduce an iron fact, it cannot be overturned at all, after the divorce between the woman and the man, she has to bear a high amount of debt, and the second half of her life has to live in the loan.