The online questioning of the Huaihe Hospital baby swap incident is the will of the people, or is it

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-03-07

Is the online questioning of the 28th Incident the popular will of the people, or is it a coercion of the judiciary? Why is the term "coercive justice" mentioned so many times? Regarding the conclusion of the 28th incident, a conclusion without truth, do netizens have the right to question it? Does it have the power to exercise the supervisory power conferred by **?

The hat of "coercing justice" is too big, who can wear it? Please don't just put this hat on the questioner, why can't you think about the problem in a different way? Isn't it a very meaningful practice to eliminate doubts, find out the truth, and answer questions and solve doubts for netizens?

How to define the law and circumstances of the questioning voice? How to grasp this scale? On what basis? Do platform netizens really have the ability to coerce the judiciary? Is questioning suspicious points considered coercion?

There have been several official announcements on the 28th incident, the conclusion of 421, and the conclusion of several judgments, all of which are called "official announcements", can't such official announcements be questioned?

How exactly are the two babies in Huaihe Hospital swapped? Why hasn't it been found out? Is it really hard to find out? How can an official announcement without factual basis and truth convince the public?

Shouldn't a conclusion come out and be judged by the world? Is the netizens' questioning of the official announcement vexatious? Why can't we face up to the skepticism of these people? Is it a waste of national resources to find out the suspicions they question?

What does a judgment that cannot be recognized by the world represent fairness and justice? Don't dare to face up to the doubts and respond to the conclusions of the doubts, are you also very weak-minded?

Since the 28 incident, it has attracted countless onlookers, at first they did not question anyone, they believe that the relevant departments will eliminate suspicions, find out the truth, and then have a fair and just verdict on the basis of the truth, but, a few years have passed, have netizens seen this?

The official announcement is there, but the baby swap incident has not found out the facts, and there is no truth, and a lot of evidence does not mean that there is no evidence, some very obvious violations, why no one has conducted a thorough investigation and accountability? Is there really nothing to do with the "stealing" behind these violations?

Netizens could not accept the conclusions of the official announcement, and they analyzed many suspicious points, such as the altered medical records in Huaihe Hospital, which were very obviously suspected of falsification, why did the investigators turn a blind eye? Altering medical records is a violation of discipline in itself, right? If it is a falsification of medical records, doesn't the motive behind it need to be investigated? After all, this matter has caused the loss of millions of state-owned assets, and it is very necessary to find out these, can you say that these doubts of netizens are unreasonable?

Ms. Du has applied for many fake certificates, and one person has applied for three different age household registrations for her children, why is this? Is there any connection between these accounts? Why do you need to apply for so many fake accounts? A fake hukou will correspond to a birth certificate, Ms. Du got so many birth certificates from **? The Xiangyang incident tells us that it is very necessary to find out where these birth certificates came from.

Even if Ms. Du is using a fake birth certificate, why is such a fake birth certificate so popular? Why can they all be "false testimonies"? Is it someone who has given them the green light in violation of the law? Or can these fake certificates be faked as true, the question is such a troublesome thing, why do you have to apply for three accounts?

If Ms. Xu and Ms. Du's children were mistakenly exchanged, since they were mistakenly exchanged, both children should have entered the household according to each other's wrong age, and Cece's age is Weiwei's real date of birth, and why isn't Weiwei's age the real date of birth using Cece?

It is strange that none of the three fake accounts that Ms. Du handled for Weiwei used the real date of birth of Cece, why is that? Isn't that a very suspicious point?

What did Huaihe Hospital do wrong? Did Ms. Du give birth here? Just a doctored medical record can't prove that Ms. Du gave birth here, right? However, Huaihe Hospital recognized everything, why did it admit in a daze?

Ms. Du proposed that the hospital did not give the child the first injection to cause her son to suffer from cancer, but the hospital has rejected Ms. Du's reason, and it stands to reason that the hospital has no reason to bear all the costs of the policy, but in the end, Huaihe Hospital still undertook all the social responsibilities and obligations of public hospitals. Is it a flood of everyone, or is it just a strategy? Based on **?

There are many doubts like this, are these doubts raised by netizens unreasonable? Isn't it reasonable? Why is this voice of netizens said by some people to be coerced? Expert He said, and Zhou Lu also said, are these demands of netizens coerced?

Is the questioning of doubts by netizens an expression of public opinion, or is it coercion in the mouths of some people? Or is it the ulterior motives of some ill-intentioned people?

Do those who oppose these doubts play a role in helping to cover up the suspicions to some extent? Is it suppressing the questioning power of netizens?

Questioning doubts is the legitimate right of netizens, and it is also the expression of public opinion, they only reasonably questioned and did not do anything against the rules, how did this become a coercion in the eyes of some people?

What law says that "official announcements" cannot be challenged? Which law says that "official announcements" must be accepted unconditionally? Is the behavior of netizens questioning suspicious points the right to be conferred?

The definition of law and emotion is really very important, and we must be cautious, and we must not arbitrarily shout such words as coercing justice, let alone let some people use the rules to be unscrupulous.

In fact, Erba's official announcement has not been affected by the doubts of netizens, the analysis of the medical records of Huaihe Hospital has been settled, and the suspicion of the secret exchange is also reasonable, but this has not affected the result of the verdict in the slightest, nor has it prompted them to investigate the suspicions, and their insistence on the conclusion of the "wrong exchange" has moved countless netizens, they are indeed insisting on their own opinions, and they are not coerced by any netizens.

Since some people think that netizens' doubts about suspicious points are coercing, why do the local people still "coldly handle" this matter? Why don't they take some measures even if they let the online ** ferment? Why can't you just interfere with the doubts on the Internet, you can take the official announcement to shut them up, why can't you do this?

The questioning of "wrong life" continues, the Xu family will not stop chasing the truth, the suspicions are being revealed little by little, and the false certificate is just around the corner, when will the suspected forged medical records of Huaihe Hospital be revealed? The medical records of Huaihe Hospital are the core of the whole drama, and it is also the most classic place, everything revolves around it, but if it is all fake, then the 28 incident will really become a bloody drama.

Don't take the surging public opinion as coercion, they are the brightest little stars in the night sky, they have no desires and no desires, and they are also the cornerstone of maintaining the rules of the family and the country from being destroyed, and their questioning is precisely to maintain the rules of the family and the country, and no one can break the rules, this is not coercion, this is a cry, a cry to injustice.

Related Pages