I am the former person in charge of a property in Sucheng District, Suqian City. On August 27, 2021, after that, I received a special equipment safety inspection instruction.
The order was issued on August 27, and the content was to let me complete the rectification by the 27th, is this trap obvious?
I immediately applied for maintenance funds, and while waiting for the approval process, I increased safety inspections and wanted to better maintain the elevator under the premise of ensuring safety. On October 13, 2021, 28 elevators have met various requirements.
Despite this, I still received a penalty decision and fined me 30,000 yuan.
I can't help but wonder: is such an administrative penalty for law enforcement or for fines? Therefore, a lawsuit was filed in Sucheng District.
In the process of going to court, all kinds of doubts gradually surfaced.
When I submitted that the order given by the other party for the first inspection was not delivered to me on the day of the inspection, I only received the second action CD provided by the other party. The other party replied, "There are two copies of **, the storage space of the law enforcement recorder is limited, and the time is longer, and the ** at that time may have been covered." ”
I don't understand, isn't the law enforcement image provision for punishment preserved for life?
When I asked to conduct a handwriting appraisal of the signature of "Luo" on the service instruction, the other party replied categorically that "the words were signed by Luo himself".
I don't understand, if I am so convinced that I signed the letter, why did I apply for the identification of notes many times, but it was not implemented?
On August 18, 2023, in the case of his own petition by the Municipal Supervision Bureau, the director of the bureau said that the two case handlers told him that "the elevator we manage has not reached the point where it must be stopped", so is there a mistake in the legal provisions applicable to the punishment?
Then again! Even if the punishment decision says that the matter has reached a serious violation, why did the law enforcers not carry out compulsory measures, and let the illegal acts last for more than 50 days, and why did the law enforcers pull the seal and take pictures alone? And not really seizing the elevator?
In a society governed by the rule of law, the documents are not formal, the procedures are not legal, the affairs are not in compliance, and there is no way to appeal. Is it so difficult to protect one's legitimate rights and interests in today's society?
I sincerely ask the higher authorities to pay attention to the thorough investigation of this matter, relevant supervision, judicial transparency, and a fair justice for our company!
Disclaimer: This manuscript is provided and published by the parties, only represents personal views, has nothing to do with the platform and **, prohibits ** and borrowing, if there is infringement or false information, you can provide materials to contact the platform!