Lao Shu said things (250).
Some people believe that the economic development of the Soviet Union proves that the socialist countries are inferior to the capitalist countries, but sometimes it is at one time or another, in the thirties of the last century, the Soviet economy flourished, the market economy of the Western countries was in mourning, and the economic crisis led to doubts about the sustainability of capitalism. At that time, a large number of masters and celebrities such as Romain Rolland, Hayek, and Russell all went to the Soviet Union to study and study, and Eastern European countries also followed the Soviet Union one-sidedly at that time, but later the planned economy had problems, and they one-sidedly supported the capitalist countries.
This is actually a pendulum effect, and does not prove that the socialist countries are necessarily unable to compete with the capitalist countries. Since the beginning of this century, China has both traces of a planned economy and elements of a market economy, and has embarked on a Chinese path that economists all over the world have not been able to explain so far, which means that we cannot go to extremes, and in addition to the planned economy and the market economy, there is also a mixed economic model, which is not a simple investment-led economic model of Roosevelt's New Deal, but a market economy under the control of pillar industries by state-owned capital.
Therefore, we should not believe too much in the previous path dependence, but should think about it, since the United States has the world's most advanced science and technology, education, finance, economy, military, political system, culture, and enterprises, why has China been greatly caught up in the past few decades, and what is the internal mechanism? What did we do right? This should be thought independently, do not be bound by the so-called previous right and wrong, practice is the only criterion for testing the truth!
China can neither completely advance the country and retreat the people, nor can it completely retreat from the country and advance the people. Instead, there are retreats and advances, and everything is based on reality, according to the needs of the national economy and people's livelihood, and in accordance with the development goal of common prosperity. For example, leading industries such as hospitals, energy, minerals, and communications should divest some of their businesses into the market to allow private enterprises to compete. However, the vegetable basket project, food production, logistics chain, daily necessities and other industries related to the survival of the people must also have state-owned enterprises to participate in the competition, in order to consider major disasters and food safety, the necessary chain support is to improve the safety of social operation.
In addition, such as gas stations, bank loans, such as small loan banks, photovoltaic power generation, etc., have been privately involved. It is still necessary to further liberalize these monopoly industries, invigorate the economy, and bring into play the creativity and enthusiasm of the private economy. Yan Yan said that there can only be a completely free market economy, not a partial market economy, that is, there can be no mixed economy, and I am against it. This does not conform to Chinese characteristics and national conditions, and still less does it make full use of the special status of state-owned capital in the domestic economy. It has been difficult for Western countries to provide free nucleic acid testing for the whole people and maintain three years of investment in the new crown like our country, which is the characteristic of state-owned enterprises in the national economy and people's livelihood, and should not be abandoned, and the practice of the three-year epidemic has proved that this is necessary.