Oh, my God! Woman drills courier loophole! More than 100 claims! Profit 3 70 thousand!

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-03-04

"If you don't accept it, just return it, how can you complete the task more than 100 times".

How can you bear to blackmail those who work at sunrise and rest at the bottom of society,".

The new version of the "Measures for the Administration of the Express Market", which has been implemented since March 1, clearly stipulates that employees of express delivery companies are not allowed to discard or trample on customers' packages at will. Packages must not be handled in a smart box unless expressly permitted by the customer. Those who violate these rules can face fines of up to $30,000.

Recently, due to the strict enforcement of the new courier service regulations, the public began to notice the first complaint ticket for non-compliance with the new regulations: a courier was severely complained by a customer for failing to deliver a package directly to the customer's doorstep in accordance with the regulations, and finally had to accept a fine of five hundred yuan.

This time, the courier boy was punished for not complying with the relevant rules and regulations, but at the same time, one woman saw that it was an opportunity or "loophole" that could be exploited at the institutional level.

Coincidentally, a Shanghai court recently made public a case in which a woman, Peng, carefully planned a malicious claim plan against a courier company after buying a large amount of fresh produce online, but was eventually formally prosecuted for involvement in extortion and extortion.

She cleverly used a small strategy, using hundreds of addresses and three **numbers in a row to buy fresh food, and deliberately did not answer the courier**, which was done to allow the courier to sign for the delivery in advance and then make delivery arrangements.

In fact, Peng unexpectedly noticed that the courier would sometimes sign for the delivery in advance in order to prevent overtime, and then start the actual delivery work.

She sees the short time gap between signing for and delivering as an opportunity to take advantage of. Subsequently, Peng adopted a series of means, using the strategy of "sign first and send later", made false reports on the complaint more than 100 times in a row, and provided PS with the value of modification! The amount of compensation obtained through fraudulent means has cumulatively exceeded 370,000 yuan, resulting in huge economic losses for the express company.

In short, Peng used a tiny link in the express delivery process to fabricate excuses to defraud the courier company many times, and finally broke the law.

Peng's behavior of taking advantage of the problem of the express delivery process to make illegal profits has now attracted widespread attention and heated discussions on the Internet, attracting the eager attention and discussion of a large number of netizens.

I'm really confused as to how these guys came up with all these sorts of frauds, and I can't even think of anything.

Conduct such behavior above the moral bottom line! Can the funds be used?

New regulations have been introduced, but there are still a large number of people who exhibit such unethical behavior.

Regarding whether the money from the courier boy will be refunded to him, I would love to know this.

This one earned 370,000 people have been sued, and many more are faced with the problem of how to deal with this kind of hundreds or thousands of profits?

You want to be affordable, but you want to deliver to your home, and at the same time you don't want to provide high-quality service.

This modern version of the "white wolf with empty gloves" farce reveals the shortcomings of the express delivery industry in terms of management and service processes. These problems are not addressed in a timely manner. In the eyes of those with ulterior motives, he is like a tempting "fat". The chaos in the express delivery industry is not only the inevitable result of poor supervision and unclear responsibility, but also the result of the lack of social integrity, poor business environment and imperfect legal system. We hope that relevant enterprises can learn from this experience to further optimize their internal management processes and improve the quality of their services, so as to ensure that those who take advantage of loopholes to make illegal profits have nowhere to escape.

Social hotspots

Related Pages