Brother Wen Ping
What era is it, still buying and selling? The Education and Sports Bureau of Guangfeng District, Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province issued instructions to schools in the district to purchase agricultural products, requiring the transfer to be completed at 4 p.m. on the same day, what is the situation?On February 29, a teacher in Guangfeng District, Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province broke the news that the Guangfeng District Education and Sports Bureau issued a notice requiring teachers in the district to purchase 1,000 yuan of agricultural products in the designated **, in order to improve the ranking of online sales of agricultural products in our district in the province.
The Education and Sports Bureau issued such a notice, which is dissatisfying, to know that all teachers are trade union members, and the Education and Sports Bureau issued a notice naming the principal, and the notice clearly made a requirement, requiring the school's trade union members to complete the order of 1,000 yuan per person on February 29, giving a specific operation process and requiring it to be completed before 4 p.m. that day.
The Education and Sports Bureau also moved out the district committee and district **, which is a requirement made according to their work instructions, which teacher dares not to implement it? The teacher who broke the news believed that this move was suspected of forced consumption, and he complained"1,000 yuan is not a small amount, everyone has resistance, this time to ask to buy agricultural products, who knows if next time will ask to buy a car. ”
Netizens voiced: Can the place of teaching and educating people be linked to the economy? Is the school a place to teach and educate people, or a place to bring goods? Forcing teachers to buy agricultural products may not only infringe on their legitimate rights and interests, but also damage their credibility. While promoting local economic development, more attention should be paid to the rationality and legitimacy of methods and methods to avoid unnecessary social controversy.
How convincing is a misunderstanding, a misdescription? On the afternoon of March 1, the WeChat official account of the Guangfeng District Federation of Trade Unions in Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province "Guangfeng District Federation of Trade Unions" issued a statement on the situation of "Guangfeng District requires teachers to buy agricultural products on e-commerce platforms", and the entire explanation can be summarized in 16 words, which is to understand deviations, wrong descriptions and improper operations.
The staff of the Education and Sports Bureau explained that the purchase of agricultural products does not need to be paid by individuals, and is paid by the benefits of the trade union, but the individual needs to pay in advance, and the subsequent union will return it to the individual.
A reporter consulted the district trade union, and the person in charge of the trade union pushed the problem to the trade union of the Education Bureau, and the staff of the district trade union explained to the reporter that the notice was indeed issued by the trade union of the Education and Sports Bureau, but the cost was paid by the trade union in a unified manner, and the follow-up will be returned to the individual, and the agricultural products purchased are equivalent to the benefits issued by the trade union every year. "Not only the education system, but all units in Guangfeng District, as long as they are trade unionists, are required to buy. The person in charge said helplessly, "The Education and Sports Bureau only conveys the requirements of the district, and other counties and districts also operate in this way." ”
The person in charge of the trade union said that the money was paid in advance by the teacher, and the follow-up trade union would call the teacher, which was equivalent to giving benefits to the teacher, which was strange, didn't the Spring Festival just end? The Shangrao trade union has given benefits to teachers again?
The netizen's statement was very direct, and he said unequivocally that the price of 1,000 yuan was actually less than 600. The welfare issued by the unit, a barrel of oil is 138 yuan, and the usual purchase is 68, and the excess seventy goes into whose pocket? The best millet on the market is 7 yuan a catty, and the one recommended by the Education and Sports Bureau is 10 yuan a catty, so I can't say.
Since it is a benefit for teachers, why should teachers pay in advance? If it is not **, each teacher does help with 1,000 yuan, is there a shortage of catties or two? Besides, is it for each teacher to pay 1,000 yuan for political performance?
After being **, the official said that it had changed, and the Guangfeng District Federation of Trade Unions said that at present, "the trade union of the Guangfeng District Education and Sports Bureau has been instructed to investigate and verify the actual purchase behavior of teachers, and fully respect the willingness of teachers to purchase independently." From "compulsory" to "voluntary", the change is big enough.
Editor's Note:
Impulse, to face to come up with this trick, the official media made expectations for this incident: I hope this is a reflection of the relevant departments to truly understand and respect the personal wishes of teachers, rather than an emergency move in the face of public opinion, it is really good, I hope that the Shangrao City Trade Union and the Education and Sports Bureau can be sober.