Mr. Mo Yan got into a lawsuit, and a person named Mao Xinghuo sued him in court, and it was the capital court, on the charge of "insulting the martyrs".
Since Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize in Literature, there has been a lot of controversy about his works, and he naturally praises him, and belittles him as worthless.
Especially in recent years, the voices of belittling and accusing Mo Yan have become more and more intense, and there is a tendency to storm the building, of course, none of them dare to find fault with Mo Yan's literary skills and attainments, but they pointed the finger directly at the key point, and put a big hat of "insulting the martyrs" to Mo Yan.
Recently, the online blogger "Mao Xinghuo who tells the truth" posted that he had launched a lawsuit against Mo Yan and submitted relevant materials to the Beijing court.
The content of the material lists 26 "crimes" against Mo Yan.
Some of Mo Yan's "smearing and insulting martyrs and beautifying the Japanese army invading China" listed by Mao Xinghuo in the indictment are mostly excerpted from some chapters of Mo Yan's works in various periods, and some are the content of Mo Yan's speeches on different occasions.
Who is this Mao Xinghuo? Probably not his real name, it should be his screen name, surnamed Mao Xinghuo, the meaning of which is self-evident.
His IP address shows that he is from Hebei, and it is rumored that he is from Chengde, Hebei, and he is wearing a mask on his headline account** shows that the person is still very young,** should have undergone beautification treatment, and he can't see his actual age clearly, but he will not be more than 40 years old.
In order to prosecute Mo Yan, Mao Xinghuo took great pains and did his homework, he said in ** that in order to collect evidence, he bought many copies of Mo Yan's books, and claimed that he would vomit when he read it.
Mao Xinghuo has more than 200,000 followers on Weibo, and while he initiated the prosecution of Mo Yan, he also conducted an online vote on Weibo, and so far, there are more than 10,000 people in favor of suing Mo Yan.
Judging from the online signature vote he initiated, the proportion of votes in favor is much higher than that of those who do not support and do not care.
Mao Xinghuo also said that he had received a lot of unfair treatment because of this, and he had been banned for two or three years, which was the source of income he relied on to survive.
And his mobile phone number was unexpectedly published on the Internet, he has recently received a lot of cyberbullying, and he is even worried about his personal safety.
He also posted on his personal account the credentials of going to the capital court and the procuratorate, and it is understandable to go to the court to prosecute, but he doesn't know what the legal procedure is to go to the procuratorate to initiate a public prosecution.
Judging from Mao Xinghuo's personal account, most of the content he publishes promotes patriotic feelings and criticizes some people and events who make inappropriate remarks.
Mao Xinghuo's lawsuit against Mo Yan caused an uproar on the Internet, and the well-known ** person Hu Xijin posted a post refuting his lawsuit.
Lao Hu said: "This matter is for individual use.""Hit Mo Yan"It is difficult to say whether the prosecution can be formally filed, let alone get the result that the prosecutor wants. ”
What Lao Hu wants to express is that it is safer for some people to buckle Mo Yan's hat under the banner of patriotism, so that they can earn traffic and income without losing money.
Lao Hu's voice is similar to the central media's early "Patriotism is not business, and there should be evidence for reporting." ”
There is also a lawyer on the Internet, Zhao Yiyi, who ridiculed Mao Xinghuo's claim of 1.5 billion yuan from Mo Yan: the litigation request is 1.5 billion, and the litigation fee for the first instance will be more than 7 million, I hope he can do what he says, hurry up and pay the fee in time.
CCTV financial commentator Zhang Hong also posted an article saying: It is not terrible to have a dispute over literary works, but what is terrible is to put a hatster on the writer's platform, and even sue the writer if he does not agree with the writer's work, trying to serve the literary works he doesn't like judicially.
Writer Li Yingbing also posted an article saying: Suing Mo Yan to the court is an absurd farce, literature only has slogans left, only *** is left, is it still literature?
Although I have not read Mr. Mo Yan's masterpiece, I also know a little about the content of the story and the background of the times narrated in his works.
Write ** can not be written into eight strands, the character portrayal should be lifelike, to conform to the historical background and authenticity of the characters at that time, in a specific historical era, due to information blockage, people can not obtain information from the outside world, it is inevitable that there will be deviations in cognition, and the absurdity in language is also in line with reality.
Therefore, we can't use our current cognition to understand the cognition of people in that historical era, after all, we have not experienced it, nor have we dug deep like Mo Yan.
It's like some people always talk about Mr. Mo Yan eating coal, he has never eaten coal, and he has never seen anyone who has eaten coal, so he thinks that coal cannot be eaten, and he doesn't know that in a specific period and a specific person, someone really has eaten coal and soil.
But I also think that some of the characters and dialogue descriptions in Mo Yan's book are really inappropriate, and the 26 points picked out by Mao Xinghuo are really fine when viewed individually.
However, whether some of Mo Yan's remarks in non-works came from Mo Yan's mouth, Mao Xinghuo should come up with strong evidence to support them, not hearsay.
Mao Xinghuo has exhausted some fragments of the so-called "insulting martyrs" in Mr. Mo Yan's article, and he should observe whether there is a phenomenon that he wants to sue from the perspective of the overall situation of the work.
Some people say that it is sad and ridiculous to bring legal action against a writer who was ahead of his time, don't you think?
We can't deny Mao Xinghuo's patriotic feelings, and we don't dare to agree with Lao Hu who said that this is his business, didn't Lao Hu say that he needs multiple voices, how can he get to Mao Xinghuo.
It remains to be seen whether they are talking about doctrines and actually doing business.