The scoring test in the Jordan era, the rules have changed now, how does history evaluate it?
Jordan averaged a whopping 45 points per game? In today's era of "body hair" blowing, why can't Jordan do it?
However, don't ask who Jordan is. Chamberlain averaged 50 per game on the field4 rebounds, and that's exactly what he did on the court. Jordan has an eternal striking distance on the court, and he has endless stamina. If he wants to, he has no problem averaging 45 goals per game. I can't say an average of 50 points per game, but Jordan's 45 points are definitely not going to be a problem.
The 35-year-old Bryant shot 46 percent from inside the three-point line, compared to Jordan Bulls' 504%。In the small-ball period, there were far more games than in the 60s. Is it hard for Jordan to shoot 55 percent from the field? And a poor defensive combination, like O'Neal, has a range of movement of just 3 meters. In the 90s, Jordan scored easily in front of taller players, and now, Jordan can't do that, 50 rebounds, 45 rebounds, you want!
As I said, Jordan could easily score 45 points on 30 shots per game, and at 08-10, the Lakers were able to win the championship in the same way. In other words, Jordan wanted to score 45 points, but he didn't want to, and couldn't. And Kobe Bryant averaged 96 points per game in '06, and he averaged 35 per game this season4 points, which is why the Lakers have not been able to improve for more than two months, and Jackson hopes that Kobe Bryant can give him more time to show himself.
From mid-January to early March, Bryant averaged 41 points per game. In that time, he had a chance to score 62 points in three quarters, and he scored 81 points in a single game. Four times he scored more than 50 points. If Jordan had relaxed a little bit at the beginning of the season, he would have scored 50 points, which is why many retired stars say that Jordan averages more than 50 points, and Iverson himself will not say that he averages 43 points per game!
Then they began to discuss which one was taller and stronger between Jordan and James, and even compared the information of the two to confirm their opinion. What's the point of the same game, the same game? Can it still be judged by numbers? Such a topic is simply to get more traffic and attention. James is great, but don't think you're a great man. The real GOAT is our competition.
At that time, Jordan's unparalleled physique, even in the face of wolves, did not hurt much, even if he knelt for three years, he never admitted defeat, knelt wherever he went, and stood wherever he knelt, without the slightest idea of surrendering to the enemy, thinking about how to defeat the opponent strongly, and the road to the king, but became a legendary god-level figure, but he was known as the greatest Jordan in history, in his career, but he looked light-hearted, and on the road to the king, he could always turn evil into good fortune!