First original article, please do not plagiarize.
The term "malicious wage demand" is said to have originated from the boss of a large enterprise and was proposed by him in a proposal at a certain session of the National People's Congress. Since the emergence of this term, it has aroused widespread concern and controversy in society. Many people believe that the term "malicious wage bargaining" has subverted our perception for thousands of years, and at the same time, it has also subverted people's general conscience.
The term "debt repayment" was first seen in the Yuan Dynasty.
There was a well-known figure in the Yuan Dynasty, Ma Zhiyuan, who said in the second compromise of "Ren Fengzi": "You can know that killing people pays for life, and debts are repaid, you say so." This is the earliest record of the term debt repayment in history.
The meaning of the word "debt repayment" is: you owe a debt and have to pay it back. This word and its meaning appear in many dictionaries and dictionaries.
Repay debts", a consensus and concept has been formed among people for thousands of years. It is widely recognized that it is natural to repay debts, and it is a wrong and shameless act to not repay debts owed to others.
Most of the people who put forward the term "malicious wage demand" and those who endorse it are people who have capital; At the same time, they are also bound to be capitalists who owe a lot of debts to others.
If you don't repay the debts you owe to others, they will inevitably ask you for them, which is a social axiom. In the people, if they do not repay their debts, the debtors are usually said to be old and will be generally despised. This is because it is a matter of course to repay debts, and if you do not repay the debts you owe to others, it is against common sense and justice, which is a low-level thing that only unreasonable people can do.
Obviously, the emergence of the term "malicious wage demand" is to subvert the concept of debt repayment that people have formed for thousands of years, and it also violates people's general conscience.
The so-called "malicious wage demand" is nothing more than some excesses when asking for wages. For example: gathering crowds to ask for wages, waving slogans to ask for wages, going around the office or home of the person in arrears, and so on.
Let's ask: If the people who ask for wages can get their wages relatively smoothly, will they still take more drastic salary bargaining behaviors? The answer is: Definitely not!
Often, the vast majority of wage seekers are forced to take drastic action after they have gone through the normal and reasonable demand process and are forced to take drastic action when they do not get the wages they are entitled to.
For thousands of years, it has been a matter of course to repay debts. How can you blame the workers for their peaceful wages and you don't give them to others, and the workers want to support their families and survive, and they are forced to think of other ways to ask for wages in order to survive and live?
Those who owe wages to workers are the owners of capital, they are a powerful group; The vast majority of those who are owed wages are workers, migrant workers, etc., and they are a vulnerable group. This brings us to the heavy question: And who are we supposed to fight? Who to protect?