U.S. Secretary of StateBlinken's speech at the Munich Security Conference made quite a splash. He warned the nations of the world, inInternationalIn the system, either they go with the United States, or they are ready to be put on the "menu", forming a-for-tat situation. This statement is straightforward, explicit, and confrontedThe U.S.-China gameAn increasingly white-hot reality. From a historical and practical point of view, Blinken's remarks not only revealed the hegemonic mentality of the United States, but also exposed some flaws facing the United States. With this sentence, Blinken is trying to send a threatening and warning message to the world, indicating that the United States will continue to pursue a Cold War mentality and continue to try to divide the world into its own sphere of influence.
Expanding: Blinken's speech sent a message like a slap in the face, and although the rhetoric was directed at asking allies to take sides, it actually highlighted the weakness of US hegemony. The "table" and "menu" in his mouth are full of symbolism, showing that the United States is rightInternationalThe desire for control in the political arena. Although Blinken tried to use his remarks to put the world in a situation of encirclement and suppression, such unilateralism and hegemony will only arouse the vigilance and opposition of more countries. The United States may not have expected that the world is no longer willing to be "led by the nose" and that many countries are more willing to decide their foreign policies according to their own interests, which to a certain extent reveals the complex and changeable nature of the United States todayInternationalDilemmas in geopolitics.
The logic of ideological opposition implicit in Blinken's mouth is based on the past ideological foreign policy of the United States itself. However, this confrontational ideology no longer conforms to the development trend of multipolarization and pluralism in the world. Today's world attaches more importance to equality and mutual benefit among countries, and no longer believes in the absolute superiority of the so-called Western values. Although some European countries still regard "democracy" and "freedom" as iron laws, countries in Southeast Asia, South America, Africa and other regions have shaken off the shackles of ideology and paid more attention to practical cooperation and mutual respect between countries. Judging from the stance of some countries on Sino-US relations, they are more inclined to make decisions based on their national interests rather than rashly following a major power in order to seek so-called "moral justice."
Expanding: Blinken's U.S. ideological diplomacy has shown a certain obsolescence and rigidity. in a multipolarWorld patternThe concepts of "democracy" and "freedom" can no longer unilaterally determine the interrelations between countries. The flexibility and independence shown by the countries of Southeast Asia in handling Sino-US relations deserve the world's deep consideration. These countries are inInternationalThere is more emphasis on national interests in the relationship, and it will not follow any major country recklessly. They uphold independence and autonomy, are free from external interference, and defend national sovereignty and development rights and interests. However, the unilateralism of the United States and its external coercion and inducement will arouse the resentment and resistance of these countries, demonstrating the United States in today's situationInternationalIsolation and dilemma on stage.
Countries around the world do not want to be manipulated and manipulated, but are more inclined to choose their own positions and actions. Although the United States is trying to contain and influence the choices of other countries through heavy-handed means, more and more countries have begun to abandon ideological shackles and stand firmly on the position of safeguarding their own national interests. A great power wrestling with China and the United StatesGamblingMore and more countries have begun to find their place in China, insist on independence and self-determination, and dynamically adjust their relations with China and the United States according to the actual situation. This kind of practice of resisting external pressure and insisting on an independent position is a reflection of today's situationInternationalThe general trend of national consciousness awakening and independence in relations.
Expanding: Under the new situation of the worldInternationalRelationships are increasingly diverse and changeable. withGlobalizationWith the deepening of the process, more and more countries have begun to shake off the shackles of the past, think independently, make their own choices, and promoteInternationalRelations are moving in a more egalitarian and harmonious direction. In the context of the gradual tension between China and the United States, small and medium-sized countries have shown a more mature and proactive attitude, and are unwilling to passively accept the command of the so-called major powers, but are more inclined to maintain a balance with all parties on the premise of safeguarding their own interests. This kind of independent stance and action has made the world more multipolarInternationalThe relationship landscape adds more dynamism and variables. In this process, independent choice and equal treatment have become the treatment of more countriesInternationalImportant guidelines for transactions.
Blinken warned that countries around the world will either walk with the United States or be prepared to be placed on the "menu" in an attempt to assert American hegemony through such threats and intimidation. However, with the development of the world situation andInternationalAs relations have changed, more and more countries have chosen to adhere to an independent diplomatic stance, shake off the shackles of ideological confrontation, and pay more attention to national interests and peaceful development. Against this backdrop, the evolution of the U.S.-China relationship requires not only equal treatment and mutual respect on both sides, but also mutual respectInternationalAll countries in society actively participate in and jointly safeguard itInternationalPeace and stability. Only through the joint efforts of all countries can we build a more just and equal worldInternationalorder to achieve the goal of common prosperity and development of all countries.