Many Americans have always questioned the strength of the Chinese power, citing that China has not participated in any war in the past 40 years and lacks actual combat experience in modern warfare.
However, this logic is really laughable.
I have to say that the cultural confidence and education behind this idea really contribute to it.
Let's think about it from another angle, in the past 40 years, which modern army has the United States really fought against?
The answer, of course, is zero.
So, what constitutes military power? What exactly does modern warfare experience mean?
Do you have to be like the United States, looking for oil fields everywhere, using the most sophisticated ** against those small countries whose ** equipment is far behind, causing them domestic turmoil, in order to prove their military strength?
Could it be that using heavy ** to strike at weak targets can be called the experience of modern warfare?
Moreover, have the Americans ever wondered why China did not enter the war for forty years? If we weren't strong enough, would we be able to enjoy forty years of peace?
As Mr. Qian Xuesen said: having a sword in your hand and not using a sword are two different things.
Suffice it to say that just because we haven't fought in 40 years doesn't mean we haven't exercised in 40 years. In this regard, netizens from all over the world also gave their opinions on the question of the American netizen.
Let's start by taking a look at the views of Canadian geopolitical expert Nathan James:
In his self-introduction, he made it clear that his goal is to defend China, to resist the malicious slander and accusations of the West, especially the United States, and to fight against prejudice, hatred and ignorance.
He believes that despite many misunderstandings, it is not necessary to have actual combat experience to know how to fight. In fact, every country in the world has its own army, but not every country is involved in war.
If these countries did not enter the war, would they not be able to defend themselves? The key to mastering operations lies in the first study of strategy and tactics, which is why military academies exist.
Second, it is necessary to train outstanding strategists and tacticians, and to select and train the best personnel.
Thirdly, the soldiers are well trained.
Fourth, military exercises and drills should be held on a regular basis.
Fifth, the development of the best or at least extremely good military technology.
Sixth, it is necessary to raise morale and arouse fighting spirit. Chinese people are full of enthusiasm and are extremely proud of their country.
In addition, China has thousands of years of military history and a deep cultural heritage. It can be compared to the martial arts that Asians are good at. Martial artists dedicate their lives to learning, but they want to never have to hurt others with martial arts.
They practice a lot, and some even participate in competitions, which is similar to military training and exercises. Most martial artists do not gain real combat experience through street fights. So, are you willing to work with such artDoes one of the sorcerers do martial arts?
This punch has been done for 20 years. Can you stop it?
The second is the answer of Indian netizen KB, who graduated from the University of Madras, an elite Indian university
You're right, they haven't had a war for 40 years and have no experience in modern warfare. But what exactly is modern warfare? Who has ever had the experience of modern warfare? The last all-out war was between China and the United States, North and South Korea, and the rest of the war was a skirmish, a war of attrition.
The invasion of Iraqis is basically blatant bullying. So. When you look at China, you will see the four major factors that are crucial in modern warfare, supply lines, ammunition and equipment, supply rates, domestic economy, and logistics. That's what you need in modern warfare, not American GIs like in Hollywood movies.
And China has all four, with ample oil reserves and is refining diesel at record rates. Even American experts admit that China can deliver 1,700 liters of diesel fuel per day to a front line of 8,700 kilometers, as well as ammunition and food. They have bridges, roads, railways, containers, and S400 and other anti-missile defense systems that provide cover for the air, and China can replenish its ammunition and equipment reserves almost completely autonomously.
Of course, chipsets for advanced missiles may require Western technology, but China has sufficient reserves. However, most of the other missiles, from the raw materials to the shell to the chipset and electronics, are entirely Chinese-made, and even the United States cannot do this. In addition to the United States itself, the United States needs the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Germany and Switzerland to replenish all ammunition and equipment at the pace of China or Russia. In addition, the United States needs Russian and Chinese antimony for manufacturing.
China's domestic economy is very strong, their food can be guaranteed for 30 months, and their seeds are independent, which means that like Russia, they can grow food without interruption
And then there's the logistics
From simple boots to field glasses to Kevlar fiber, on the basis of advanced warfare, China can produce enough products per day for 6 million soldiers, and no country can match it. If India goes to war, India may only be able to produce 10% of these things in three times as long as it does, and the rest is completely dependent on imports, through large quantities.
Ironically, we import components from China. Or with a large number of imported equipment, we may be able to make enough advanced war equipment for 200,000 soldiers, which is key in modern warfare. So I'm pretty sure that the squadron has a lot of power and can defeat any country in an ongoing war. After all, India's Kochi must have known what happened in 1962.
Malaysian netizen kokhin lim replied
At least you're honest about it, and I'm grateful for what you're saying. To be precise, the last time China was involved in a war was in 1979, so it has been 43 years since China went to war. You have a point, but the truth is that they have been conducting very comprehensive training, so we will wait and see if war breaks out.
What I can say is the United States or any country that attacks China, if you touch a finger of China, you will face 1,000 surprises that China has in store for you. In terms of technology, China has built the Beidou system, which is several times better than GPS, to land on the far side of Mars and the moon, to build a better space station, to be in a leading position in the field of quantum computers and 5G, on par with the United States, but more likely to replace it.
If you go to bully other countries, the United States is the best at it, I agree 100 percent, as the biggest bully in the world, he has a lot of experience, but if he attacks China, China will definitely win.
Immediately afterwards, Singaporean netizen Chiang Seng Erh replied:
The United States has many experiences in bullying small countries, but the United States has no experience with large countries like Russia and China.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ph.D. Joseph Wang replied
The whole point of having a strong army is to prevent war, and if you have a strong enough army, then they don't have to fight.