It takes about 2-3 minutes to read this article, we sincerely invite you to click the "Follow" button in the upper right corner, click first and then watch, form a habit, your support and encouragement is the biggest motivation for our creation!
Hello everyone, welcome to Dasheng Reviews, what we want to talk about in this issue is that the British cargo ship was sunk in an attack, the Houthis want to continue to act, and the United States has lost its voice again.
The British "Ruby" cargo ship still sank, the United States lost its voice again, and after being retaliated by the United States and Britain for air strikes, the Houthis said that they would continue to attack British ships, and Sunak ** This time it was really kicked to the iron plate.
In the past few months, the "Red Sea crisis" has caused a lot of headaches for the United States and the West, and after the Houthis attacked ships related to Israel, a large number of American and Western cargo ships had to make a detour, and the transportation cost has greatly increased, not to mention the "arrival time" has also been longer.
If the transportation of goods around the world is restricted, the United States and the West will not have such a big reaction, but Chinese merchant ships can be unimpeded, without increasing transportation costs, and can reach their destinations quickly.
After forming the so-called "escort formation", the United States and Britain also carried out air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen many times, trying to force the Houthis to stop their attacks in the Red Sea.
According to the Beijing News on March 4, the senior ** in charge of foreign affairs of the Yemeni Houthis issued a warning on the 3rd that Britain attacked Yemen and supported the "atrocities of the Israeli army ** Gaza residents together with the United States", and the Houthis will sink more British ships in response.
The day before, Yemen** announced that the British cargo ship "Ruby", which was hit by Houthi missiles on the 18th of last month, sank off the coast of Yemen due to storms and other weather factors. As early as the time when the "Ruby" was hit, the Houthis **, the ship was badly damaged and could be at risk of sinking.
But the British side is still trying to be tough-mouthed, and the BBC specially issued a "fact-checking" report to "refute the rumors", saying that the "Ruby" freighter is not at risk of sinking, and it is also equipped with two ** of the "Ruby" floating at sea after being bombed. However, netizens who saw the "refutation of rumors"** couldn't help laughing, why?
Because the "Ruby" in ** has capsized, part of the hull has completely submerged under water, although it has not sunk, but it is not far from sinking, and it can be vaguely confirmed from the appearance that this is the "Ruby". The BBC's "refutation of rumors" almost became a "stone hammer", which made many netizens who read the report find it very interesting.
It is not difficult to see that the British side is working very hard to maintain its image of the "British Empire," which has long since disappeared, and does not hesitate to refute the rumors through such a meaningless way of "chewing on words" for the sake of refutation.
It is worth mentioning that the reaction of the United States after learning of the sinking of the British cargo ship, the United States, which has been carrying frequent air strikes against targets in Yemen since January 12, has maintained a rare "silence" on this matter, giving people the feeling that the United States has finally "dragged Britain into the water".
The British side's practice in the past 10 days from the time the "Ruby" was hit and finally sank was also very intriguing; it did not send personnel to repair the hull, nor did it send a rescue ship to tow the "Ruby" away, but only said that the cargo ship would not sink, did not take any practical action, and finally watched the cargo ship sink.
This can't help but lead to speculation, whether Britain deliberately abandoned the cargo ship, or did it dare not send someone to save the ship? Or is it incapable of saving? Personally, I prefer the latter two possibilities, not daring or not being able to.
You know, not long ago, Britain made an "international joke", when its two ** ships were on a mission in the Middle East, they collided, and one of them was knocked out of a big hole. Russian media joked that the accident seemed to have happened when the ship was reversed, which shows how failed the helmsman's operation was at that time. Today's Britain is no longer an empire on which the sun never sets, and it is declining as fast as a free fall.
Due to the rules of the platform, it is convenient to push similar articles for you in the future, and get the latest information as quickly as possible, if you like this article, please like, comment, **thank you!