"You're a tofu scum cross talk! ”
The so-calledMainstream cross talkA faction, inCrosstalk Conferenceon public sarcasm"Non-mainstream cross talk".One faction, calling the other party is"Tofu dregs cross talk".As soon as this set of remarks came out, it caused widespread discussion.
It's all about cross talkWhy does it have to be "mainstream" and "non-mainstream"? Why do the two sides have to quarrel? Why can't we progress together?
Finally, China's cross talk,Is there still tomorrow?
3 daysThe 5th Cross Talk ConferenceIt's over, but this oneMainstream cross talkThe discussion caused by the performance has intensified, and netizens are interested inWhich side is good at speaking and which side should be supportedIt's a lot of noise.
One of the points of controversy is that"Non-mainstream cross talk" is caricatured as "tofu scum cross talk"., the mainstream cross talk faction is also jokingly called"Confidential cross talk".In short, I can't tell which side is more worthy of affirmation.
There is a cross talk in this cross talk conference, which is clearly ironicSome cross talk actors copied memes on the Internet, and the performance of the stalk,In order to get traffic, it is uglyThis is the so-called "tofu dregs".
And the mainstream cross talk conference is called "confidential cross talk" becauseThe performances from the first to the third are not open to the public, this move caused dissatisfaction among cross talk lovers.
Why don't you show itAre you afraid that it will be too bad to show it to others?
The power of * is huge, I don't want to be surrounded by ** anymore, the cross talk conference is finalIn the fourth session, the live broadcast format was openedso that everyone can see it.
However, when netizens happily walked into the live broadcast room, they came out one by one scolding:"The quality of the program is too poor", "the jokes are all old stalks", and "there is nothing new"., these comments are hard to hear.
What's even worse is that in the fifth session of this year, the number of people in the live broadcast room has dropped from 10,000 in the previous yearThat's 10,000 people
What can save a little face for the organizers is this timeAt the beginning of the fight, the rating was turned off, but no one said anything nastyBecause I can't say it at all.
Netizens said that some actors in "non-mainstream cross talk" plagiarized stalks on the Internet, which is of course not advisableBut you can't kill everyone with one shot.
Especially toDeyun Clubfor the Lord's civil society, theymade a great contribution when the cross talk group was about to run out of foodand let this traditional artThere is no decline in the people
Mainstream cross talk may be old and uninspired, but this kind of cross talkIt carries a lot of cultural heritage, embodies the wisdom of the creator between the lines, and needs the blessing of knowledge.
Look at it this way,The two sides are evenly matched, has its own strengths, but also has its own shortcomings, if you want to say who is better, it's really hard to say.
To sum up,Mainstream cross talk is elegant and cultured, but it is not well-known among the masses, and "non-mainstream cross talk" is relatively vulgar and popular, but it is very well-known among the masses.
So which side is itIt is necessary to provoke a "struggle" between the two sidesThis?
The masses generally focused their eyes on itJiang Kun, the leader of the mainstream cross talk factionbody, asRepresentative inheritor of the fourth batch of national intangible cultural heritage items (cross talk)., the responsibility on his shoulders is not small.
Many netizens said that at a time when the entire cross talk industry was facing a troughIt is the folk groups (such as Deyun Club) that gradually enter the eyes of the public again by relying on small performances one by one.
Jiang Kun's mainstream cross talk is good, butIt was not possible to achieve such a great achievement from the "non-mainstream" faction, perhaps because of the imbalance in my heart, I will say the words "non-mainstream cross talk" many timesand flaunts his orthodox mainstream cross talk.
WhileThe folk cross talk led by Deyun Club is also very unconvincedAh, is it wrong to walk the streets and alleys and run small theaters to perform cross talk? Is it wrong to make more people like cross talk? Is it wrong to want to survive in the cracks?
Actually,It's hard to tell who's right and who's wrong.
One party wants to maintain cross talkElegance and culture, thus looking down on each other to use"Three customs".In this way, it is easy for the public to characterize cross talk as "three vulgar arts".
The other side wants to pass the "three vulgar" jokesAttract the audience, when you earn fame yourselfAble to eat well, only after eating a full meal can we talk about how to carry forward the art of cross talk.
Both sides perform cross talk, and the actors have all undergone hard basic training, and they both hope that cross talk itself can go further, in factAligned in the ultimate purpose
So, if possible,Why can't we learn from each other's strengths and develop together?
Whether it is mainstream cross talk or "non-mainstream cross talk", at presentare in an awkward position
Mainstream cross talk also understands that it does not have so many mass bases, and it is also moving towards it"Down-to-earth".The style of the effort, just for nowLittle success
Non-mainstream cross talk" at the beginningThe momentum is boomingBut in recent years, due to the improvement of the cultural quality of the people, those "three customs" jokes are no longer popularThe mass base is being lost.
From this point of view, if you want to keep the art of cross talk,Both sides have a long way to go, now the most important thing is,Create a new path that is suitable for the current situation, and carry forward the art of cross talk.
At this point,Listen to Yunxuan's Cao Yunjincame up with his own plan, although he was a person in some waysDebatable, butHis talent in cross talk is really good.
In May last year, Cao Yunjin openedThe form of "live cross talk"., although this form sounds a bit "alternative", but it has been achievedNot a small result
In the past, you had to go to the garden to buy tickets to listen to cross talk, and if you couldn't buy tickets, you couldn't see them, and you couldn't see them if you didn't have money, but now it's different, audienceYou just need to click into the live broadcast roomYou can watch it if you want, anyone can watch it, and there is no threshold at all.
And Cao Yunjin's cross talkThe data in the live broadcast room is unexpectedly goodThe number of people is very stableIt is 10 times that of this year's cross talk conferenceJudging from this data, Cao Yunjin can be called a success, at least the first step towards success.
This is another person who came out to sing the opposite, saying that Cao Yunjin can't do thisThis will destroy the traditional art form of performance.
However, Cao Yunjin withstood the pressure, or he didn't care about these voices at all, he had his own arrangements, saidPreparations will be made for the offline tourand this is to beOnline and offline.
Is this form really good?
There is no definite answer, but now it seems that the data is not bad, maybe it may also lack stamina, but it is just a temporary popularity.
, butWhat everyone affirms is Cao Yunjin's willingness to ponder the new situation, no matter what the final result is, at least he has tried.
China's cross talk wants to have a bright tomorrowIt is not the responsibility of a certain group or a single personWe should all work together to innovate.
For the struggle between mainstream cross talk and "non-mainstream cross talk".To be honest, everyone is tired of watching, everyone doesn't care about some people's private grievances, everyone justI don't want personal grievances to ruin the progress of the entire cross talk industry
The mainstream pays attention to elegance, and the "non-mainstream" is accustomed to the "three vulgarities", but cross talk isThe art of both the elegant and the vulgarDaya is vulgar, and vulgarity is daya, it is not advisable to have a serious bias in the style of either side.
"It's the same root, why is it too anxious to fry each other? ”
Noisy, blame-point-blaping, inextricable, it's just thereWaste of time, with this thought, it's really not as goodLet's find out where the tomorrow of cross talk is.