Even I didn't expect that I would be laid off by the reform after the holiday. The unit sent me less than 3,000 yuan of living expenses every month, and after paying the "five insurances and one housing fund", in fact, there is only a little more than 2,000 yuan per month for me to dispose of.
The cause of the incident is still because the unit efficiency has not been good in recent years. Therefore, when I went to work after the holiday, the leaders decided to reduce the number of employees and increase efficiency in the whole unit, which is a layoff in the final analysis. His reason is that the organization is bloated, the people are superfluous, there are too many people who eat idle meals, the cost of employment is increasing, and the work efficiency is not high. He said very firmly: "If this continues, the unit will collapse!" ”
How to cut? First, the institutional reform was implemented through restructuring and optimization, and then the competition for posts was launched, and a "3050" internal retirement policy was also introduced. Except for those who failed in the competition, I belong to the people who are limited by "3050". Although I have always believed that I am not an idle eater, I am not among the "exceptional" people indicated in the document.
This kind of reform and competition is a formality, and it is obviously forcing people to leave.
After I was hired by Kochi and fell off the list, I suddenly woke up to the fact that in the first half of last year, the unit was still saying that I was good and that was good, and was still calling on everyone to learn from me, but in the second half of the year, especially near the end of the year, I often became the object of criticism and accusation from the leadership, and even often named me at the small meeting of the conference, either to play on the topic or to magnify my shortcomings, and even belittle me in public, etc., so that I suddenly felt isolated and marginalized, and I felt much worse than before.
One day, the leader came to me and said that after careful consideration, he decided to adjust my job position. I was taken aback, and I said that I was 55 years old and that I would be retiring in a few years, and that I might not be able to adjust my position now and let me start from scratch. The leader did not insist, and the matter was put aside and never mentioned again. Now that I think about it, the leadership was deliberately weakening my role.
Most of the young people who failed in the competition ended up resigning by choice. In recent years, young people in units have resigned more frequently, and this time the reduction of staff and efficiency only strengthened the determination of those employees who were originally in a wait-and-see state. However, people of my age are different from them, so there is only one way for me to go, and that is to choose internal retirement.
The so-called "3050" internal retirement policy is completely tailor-made for people like me, and it is the only path that can be taken. The so-called "30" means that the working experience is more than 30 years, and "50" is the age of more than 50 years old.
What other options do I have? Although I feel aggrieved, there is no other way. It's just that I didn't expect to retire soon, but I left "honorably" in such a way. Another unpleasant thing is that "3050" makes us retreat, so why are the cadres of "3050" safe and sound?