At the Meizu 21 Pro press conference, Meizu said that Meizu 21 Pro is Xiaomi 14 Pro change, from this it is not difficult to see that Meizu 21 Pro is the target of Xiaomi 14 Pro, so Meizu 21 Pro has been successfully changed this time? Can it outperform the Xiaomi 14 Pro in the market? Could it be that as netizens said, they have never lost the vote and never won the sales?
As we all know, Meizu has always been in the appearance design, and the appearance design of Meizu 21 Pro this time is also its selling point, so what are the main differences between Meizu 21 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro?
On the screen, the Meizu 21 Pro is a standard straight screen, while the Xiaomi 14 Pro has a fully contoured micro-curved screen with narrower bezels. Although the screen of Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro has the appearance of a straight screen, and takes into account the appearance and feel of the curved screen, this screen can still be classified as a curved screen, and the problem of inconvenient film still cannot be solved well.
The difference is noticeable on the back, with the Meizu 21 Pro having a DECO-free design and a vertical camera arrangement, while the Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro has a rectangular image module design. In addition, the Meizu 21 Pro has a screen ratio of 21:9, which is more slender than the 20:9 ratio of the Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro, and in terms of body width, the Meizu 21 Pro is 7442mm, Xiaomi 14 Pro is 753mm。
The Meizu 21 Pro has a 32MP front camera and a 50MP rear main camera (OV50H, F1.).9 aperture, OIS stabilization) + 13MP ultra-wide angle (S5K3L6, 1 31 inch) + 10MP vertical telephoto (IMX754, 1 3.)52 inches, 3X optical change, OIS stabilization).
Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro has a 32MP front and a 50MP rear main camera (Light and Shadow Hunter 800, F1.)42-f4.0 variable aperture, OIS stabilization) + 50MP ultra-wide angle (Samsung JN1, 1 2.)76 inches) + 50MP vertical telephoto (Samsung JN1, 3.)2X optical variation, OIS image stabilization, telephoto macro support).
Although there is not much difference between the main camera sensors of the two, the aperture of Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro is larger, and it supports stepless variable aperture, and the secondary camera part, Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro has a larger bottom, and Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro also supports telephoto macro, which brings higher playability, and considering the difference in strength such as algorithms, Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro's image performance is more powerful.
Meizu 21 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 14 Pro are very well matched,NFC、Infrared remote control、Dual speakers、X-axis motor、IP68 and other functions are equipped,But on the fingerprint unlock,Meizu21 Pro uses a wide-area ultrasonic fingerprint,The experience will be much better than the ultra-thin optical fingerprint of Xiaomi 14 Pro,It's just a little hard to understand,Meizu21 ProWhy does it use USB 2.0。
In terms of performance, both are Snapdragon 8 Gen3, and although there will be differences in scheduling strategies between the two, there will be no particularly huge differences, so there is no need to worry about the performance part.
For the screen part, the Meizu 21 Pro uses 679-inch BOE Q9+ screen with 3192 1368 resolution. The Xiaomi 14 Pro features 673-inch CSOT C8 screen with 3200x1440 resolution. It can be seen that the screen of Meizu 21 Pro is not strictly 2K screen, and its screen substrate is not as advanced as Xiaomi 14 Pro, so the screen part of Xiaomi 14 Pro will be better.
In terms of battery life, the Meizu 21 Pro uses a 5050mAh battery, 80W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging, and the Xiaomi 14 Pro uses a 4860mAh battery, 120W wired charging, and 50W wireless charging.
Judging from the simple comparison above,The difference between Meizu21 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 14 Prois actually more obvious,If the meaning of change is better,Meizu21 ProThe change was not successful,In the words of netizens, it is a lonely change,Because in the core image part,Meizu21 ProThe performance is not as good as that of Xiaomi 14 Pro,The quality of the screen is also worse。
However, the wide-area ultrasonic fingerprint of the Meizu 21 Pro is unique, and its design is relatively unique at that price point, which is undoubtedly attractive to users who like a true straight screen.