A woman buys two bottles of Moutai and seeks to confirm the authenticity, only to be severely threatened by the merchant. The fierce reaction of the merchants has aroused widespread concern in the society.
This shocking incident occurred on March 3 in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province. In a society governed by the rule of law, it is hard to believe that someone would say such unscrupulous words. The cause of the incident is simple, a woman went to the famous wine monopoly experience hall to buy Moutai, trying to check the authenticity by scanning the code. The woman bought two bottles of Moutai for a total of 5,500 yuan, which is undoubtedly a lot of money, so she wanted to do a "code copy" wine test to confirm the authenticity of the Moutai purchased.
Normally, it is unlikely that a store of this size will have a fake, and if it is genuine, they will not have to worry about customers checking the wine. However, when the woman tried to inspect the liquor, the merchant was unwilling. The merchant directly seized the Moutai liquor in the hands of the female customer, and forbade her to test the wine, and said very angrily that the wine was not sold. In the face of the merchant's words, the female customer was very confused, after all, she had come to buy the product by herself, and she had already paid for the wine. Theoretically, these two bottles of Moutai should now belong to female customers, and the merchant has no right to take them back and claim not to sell them.
As a result of this move, a dispute arose between the two sides. During this period, the fierce reaction of merchants led to a lot of confusion. The merchant even pushed the female customer many times, but after the situation escalated, the merchant became even more panicked. Because of the large number of people, the two sides even had a physical altercation later. In addition, the wives of merchants also joined in the chaos, further exacerbating tensions.
These incidents have sparked a heated discussion in society. Many netizens believe that the fierce reaction of the merchant is extremely ridiculous, and it is obvious that they cannot understand why the merchant behaves in this way. Incidents such as these must be further addressed, but the outcome of the investigation is the deciding factor. This incident also makes people realize that the impact of the actions of merchants on the local business environment is very negative. It is hoped that a just solution will be reached in the future process.
What do you think Netizens hit in the comment area!