Thank you for saying something, before reading, I hope you will move your little hands to make a fortune and click on a free attention, thank you, your support is the biggest motivation for my creation.
In today's military competition in the world, ballistic missiles, as an important strategic **, play a key role. Especially in the Asia-Pacific region, the development of China's ballistic missiles has attracted widespread attention, and its deterrent effect on US organizations has attracted much attention. However, whether it is worth spending billions of dollars to blow up a few "holes" for such a high-cost ** system, and what exactly is the ability of the US military to repair these damages, is a highly controversial topic.
China's ballistic missile development history can be described as long and brilliant. From being equipped with liquid-fuel ballistic missiles in the 60s of the last century to the Dongfeng series of solid-fuel missiles in recent years, China's rapid progress in missile technology has attracted the attention of the world. Among them, the Dongfeng series of missiles have been continuously upgraded, such as the Dongfeng-5, Dongfeng-21, Dongfeng-26, Dongfeng-31, etc., which not only have strategic strike capabilities, but also have high-precision tactical strike capabilities. The most proud is the DF-17, the emergence of this hypersonic missile, which has added a new bright spot to China's strategic strike capability. Its huge range and high-speed flight capability make it a sharp weapon for directly smashing the enemy's important facilities, especially when targeting the US military's military airfields in the Asia-Pacific region.
However, is it worth spending so much money on destroying the US military's airfield facilities for a ballistic missile system that China has invested so much money in? And what about the repair capabilities of the U.S. military? This is a question that needs to be deepened.
First of all, the damaging effect of ballistic missiles on airfield facilities deserves attention. The runway of a military airport is one of its most critical facilities, and if it suffers serious damage, it will directly affect the take-off and landing and operational capabilities of military aircraft. In response to strikes on military airfield runways, ballistic missiles often use precision strikes to achieve the effect of quickly paralyzing enemy airfields. The restoration of military airport runways is a huge project, which requires a lot of manpower and material resources, and the time cost is high. Therefore, the destructive effect of ballistic missiles on airfield facilities is significant and has strategic deterrent significance.
Secondly, the repair capability of the US military deserves attention. Although the U.S. military has demonstrated the ability to quickly repair aircraft carrier decks and other facilities in the past, modern military airfields are much more difficult to repair. Modern military aircraft are large and require higher runways and taxiways, while restoration work requires a large number of skilled workers and specialized equipment. However, the U.S. domestic construction industry is facing a severe shortage of skilled workers and material bottlenecks, which poses a significant challenge to restoration efforts. As a result, the ability of the US military to repair airfields may be limited in the face of a large-scale ballistic missile attack, making it impossible to quickly restore the combat readiness of military airfields.
In summary, although China's investment in the development of ballistic missile systems has caused some controversy, its deterrent effect on the US military establishment should not be underestimated. At the same time, the US military's ability to repair airport facilities in the face of large-scale ballistic missile attacks also has certain limitations. Therefore, whether it is worth spending billions of dollars to blow up a few "craters" and the impact of ballistic missile strikes on the initiative in war is an issue that needs to be studied in depth. In the current environment of military competition, we need to continue to pay attention to the strategic value and impact of ballistic missiles, and make accurate judgments and responses based on the actual situation.
The above content materials, ** on the Internet do not represent the author's point of view, if there is any infringement, please contact the second deletion