Recently, the incident in which the Taiwan Provincial Coast Guard illegally rammed a mainland fishing boat, resulting in the death of two mainland fishermen, has attracted widespread attention. Against this backdrop, the two sides have held several consultations, but the Taiwan Strait Guard has refused to formally apologize. Until a recent consultation, the Coast Guard said it was willing to compensate the families of the fishermen who died and used the word "apology" in official documents, but the mainland side strongly disagreed and demanded the use of the word "apology". Behind this is not only a superficial verbal dispute, but also a confrontation of the principled positions of the two sides. In this game, the mainland side adhered to its principles and upheld its dignity, showing strong conviction and confidence. This article will provide an overview of the ins and outs of this incident, as well as the attitudes and positions of both sides in the negotiations.
After many rounds of negotiations without results, the Coast Guard has shown signs of "giving in" in the latest round of consultations. The Coast Guard reportedly agreed to pay 1.4 million yuan in compensation to the families of the fishermen who died, and used the word "apology" in the relevant documents. The shift sparked concern and controversy on both sides, sparking discussions about the subtle distinction between "apologizing" and "apologizing." For the mainland, this change means that the coast guard may begin to compromise, but the mainland still stands firm on issues of principle, because the difference between "apologizing" and "apologizing" is related to attitudes and perceptions of wrongdoing.
In this game, the mainland side has taken a firm and clear attitude, pointing out that there is a clear difference in meaning between "apologize" and "apologize", the former is understated and lacks sincerity, while the latter means admitting mistakes and sincerely admitting mistakes. For such a major event involving life, the attitude expressed must not be ignored. Therefore, the mainland side insisted that the coast guard use the word "apology" to reflect the clarity of facts and responsibility.
The Coast Guard's "softness" has caused quite a stir in the outside world, and this change seems to be a gesture of goodwill to the mainland, but from another perspective, this change may also expose the weakness and unsustainability of the Coast Guard's previous hardline stance. Compromise on issues of principle may be a matter of time, but how to reach a compromise while preserving dignity has become the key to this negotiation. The persistence and toughness of the mainland side will have a far-reaching impact on the direction and outcome of future negotiations.
In this context, the two sides are constantly playing games and competing for the initiative. However, the mainland's stance of upholding principles and upholding dignity has enabled it to occupy a strong position in the negotiations. This is not only a battle of words, but also a battle of dignity and responsibility. In the face of all kinds of uncertainties, the resoluteness and self-confidence shown by the mainland side will certainly play a vital role in safeguarding national interests and dignity.
Looking back at history, while safeguarding national interests and dignity, China has never backed down on issues of principle. Taking the 1999 US bombing of the Chinese Embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia as an example, China resolutely demanded that the United States make a formal apology for the incident, rather than simply "apologize" or "express regret." Despite the power of the United States at the time, Japan stood firm in this diplomatic game and finally won an apology from the other side after arduous negotiations. This incident demonstrates China's diplomatic stance of defying power and sticking to principles, and also verifies the importance of upholding principles in safeguarding national dignity.
Compared with the 1999 incident, although the content and form of the game with the Taiwan Provincial Coast Guard are different, the principles and stance behind it remain the same. The mainland's resolute attitude and principled stand reflect its rigor and prudence in foreign affairs. No matter what kind of challenges and pressures it faces, the mainland has always put safeguarding its national interests and dignity first and will not waver in its adherence to principles, which is a distinctive feature of China's diplomatic practice.
Past experience tells us that we will not easily compromise on any incident involving national interests and dignity, let alone make concessions. In this negotiation with the Taiwan Provincial Coast Guard, whether it is for the benefit of the families of the fishermen who died or for the sake of safeguarding the country's image and principles, the mainland side will continue to stand firm and uphold principles until a final agreement acceptable to both parties is reached. Such persistence and conviction will certainly provide important reference and guidance for handling such incidents, and will also become an important support for China's foreign policy.
To sum up, in the face of the game with the Taiwan Provincial Coast Guard, it is very important for the mainland side to uphold its principles and uphold its dignity. Whether proceeding from historical experience or diplomatic practice, we can see our country's firm stance and strong conviction in safeguarding national interests and dignity. In such cases, adherence to issues of principle and assertiveness in negotiations will have a decisive impact on the final outcome.
As a self-editor, I am deeply proud and admired for the principled stance and the spirit of upholding the dignity of the country emphasized in our foreign policy. I believe that with the efforts of the mainland side, the negotiations with the Taiwan Provincial Coast Guard will surely achieve positive results and set an example for safeguarding national interests and dignity. In my future work and life, I will also inherit this spirit of upholding principles and defying power, and contribute my strength to promoting the development and progress of our country. Let's work together for the prosperity and stability of our country!