With the deterioration of the employment environment, the difficulty of finding a job and the high unemployment rate have become common problems in today's society, many college students choose to take the postgraduate examination in order to stand out in the job market, and want to increase the chance of being admitted by improving their academic qualifications.
When they finally obtained a graduate degree through hard work, and at the same time successfully graduated from school, they were confident to look for a job with their high education, but they found that no matter how hard they worked to be admitted to 985 or 211 graduate school, people were rejected by the company because of their first degree. In the eyes of many employers, no matter how good the highest degree is, as long as the other party's first degree is not from a prestigious school, then they will be beaten back to their original shape!
In this regard, many college students have sighed, is the first degree really so important? I obviously worked so hard to change my destiny by improving my academic qualifications, but what I didn't expect was that I finally lost to the first degree! In this case, why did you work so hard to take the graduate school entrance examination in the first place?
In response to this situation, academician Pan Fusheng, a representative of the National People's Congress, suggested that only the school "origin theory" should be eliminated in the process of graduate enrollment and employment, in his opinion, whether it is graduate student enrollment or employment work, it should be based on actual ability, and should not be the first degree as the threshold for admission and job search, if only the first degree is used as a yardstick for recruiting talents, then it will violate the principle of fairness and justice!
Therefore, he suggested that relevant laws and regulations should be improved to prohibit discrimination by enterprises or enrollment units on the basis of academic qualifications, and at the same time, more clear and clear punishment clauses should be formulated, so that employers and schools will no longer be rejected because of the problem of blood spills. At the same time, he also said that the evaluation criteria for talents should be improved, not simply a degree as the first criterion, but should be ability-oriented, so that more talents will not be buried due to restrictions such as academic qualifications or origin!
In addition, the relevant institutions should strengthen the supervision of employers, to avoid them from implementing the illegal and unreasonable regulations and practices of school-only "origin theory", and at the same time, public institutions and state-owned enterprises should play a good leading role in this regard, so as to promote new talent evaluation standards!
In this regard, many netizens expressed their incomprehension, if the first degree is weakened, then what is the meaning of everyone's college entrance examination? The academic qualifications have been depreciated very seriously, and no one even cares about the academic qualifications, so why do you still have to work hard? Besides, academic qualifications are not a stepping stone to enter society, if this stepping stone has lost its basic meaning, then what should be the key to opening the society? Could it be the relationship behind it?
In short, the first degree still has its value, but it should not be the only criterion for measuring talents!