Will the change of expert selection conditions cause controversy over the experience of grassroots rural farming?
Introductory. Do you oppose the requirement to add two years of rural grassroots farming experience to the selection criteria for expert teachers?Expert teachers should be people who have made outstanding contributions in a certain field, and cannot be selected based on just a few articles and some scientific experiments, because such experts have no practical experience and will deviate from the right track in practical application and do things that go against common sense. In order to enable experts to better serve the people, I put forward three suggestions: First, all candidates should have more than three years of rural agricultural work experience;Second, the team of experts and professors will be assessed every three years, and those who do not meet the standards will be dismissedThird, it is forbidden to select experts under the age of 40 and over the age of 70.
The importance of expert experience for rural agriculture at the grassroots level.
Experts and teachers are the pinnacle of talent in society, and their selection should pay more attention to practical experience. The importance of basic experience in rural agriculture for experts cannot be underestimated. First, it allows experts to better understand people's needs and lifestyles. Rural life is a more authentic and nature-like experience. By personally participating in rural production, experts can more intuitively feel the hardships and difficulties of farmers, so as to propose solutions in a more targeted manner. Secondly, experiencing rural agriculture can enable experts to understand the current situation and development needs of the rural economy, provide a scientific basis for rural revitalization, and promote the sustainable development of the rural economy.
To ensure that the experts are truly integrated into the community during their time in rural farming, I recommend documenting their experiences and following local rules and regulations. At the end of the rural farming period, they should also write a ** and get it approved by the local population before the end of the course. This requirement will help to ensure that the experts are genuinely engaged during their field work and are recognized and supported by the local population.
The necessity and approach of regularly evaluating a team of professional teachers.
1.Dynamic Assessment:
The team of expert teachers should be evaluated every three years. These evaluation criteria should include not only the theoretical level, but also the performance of the expert in practice. Theory and practice complement each other, and only experts who have been tested in practice can truly serve society. Experts who do not meet the evaluation criteria should be resolutely dismissed to ensure the high quality and high level of the expert team.
2) Supplementary Vacancies:
Measures should be taken to resolutely remove the experts who do not meet the evaluation standards, and the vacant positions should be filled by qualified experts who have worked in grassroots agriculture for three years and passed the review. In this way, we can ensure that the positions are filled by the most capable and experienced experts, and promote the survival of the fittest in the expert team.
3) Penalties for violations:
If an expert violates the rules during his or her tenure, his or her eligibility for inclusion will be affected and his or her eligibility will be extended for at least five years. Even after resignation, if there is a violation during the term of office, it must be held accountable. Such a strict system will enable the experts to respect the law and discipline, enhance their sense of responsibility and honor, and ensure the integrity and standardization of the expert contingent.
Whether the age limit for the selection of experts is reasonable.
The age range of the selection of experts is limited in order to ensure that the experts are experienced and that the expert group is dynamic and innovative. Younger specialists may be inexperienced, while older specialists may have low energy, affecting the quality of work. In conclusion, I recommend that the age of the selection of experts should be over 40 years old and under 70 years old.
For specialists over 70 years old, although they are experienced and have stood the test of time, we also take into account their physical condition and energy. Therefore, we encourage them to take a back seat and pass on their experience and wisdom to the younger generation, so as to create more space for young people to develop.
Summary. By redefining the conditions for the selection of experts, especially increasing the requirements for rural grassroots agricultural work experience, experts will be brought closer to society and better understand the needs of the masses. At the same time, establish a system of regular evaluation, job substitution, age limit and so on to ensure the quality and vitality of the expert team. These institutional reforms will help to build a better team of experts who will not only make progress at the theoretical level, but also create more well-being for the people.
In the process of selecting experts and teachers, it is necessary to attach importance to practical experience and ensure that experts truly serve the people. Only when experts and teachers work closely with practice to solve practical problems can science and technology better benefit the whole society.