Ke Wenzhe redefined one China and said that the two sides of the strait are special ties

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

As the chairman of the People's Party, Ko Wenzhe adopted a series of strategies in order to reverse the decline in the popularity of the People's Party. Not only did he change his original line of leaning towards the Blue Camp, but he openly stated that he was dark green at heart, trying to get more support from the Green Camp. Among them, Ke Wenzhe redefined"One China"and claims that Taiwan and the mainland are in a special nexus.

Redefined"One China"The concept makes Ke Wenzhe have a more unique and prominent proposition on the issue of ***. He will"One China"It is divided into three levels, namely:"A cultural China","An economic China"with"A political China"。He said he agreed"A cultural China"He also advocated that the two sides of the strait sit down and talk"An economic China"。And for"A political China"Ke Wenzhe believes that it is very difficult to achieve. Such a division, in Ke Wenzhe's rhetoric, reveals an attitude that is far from the painful reality.

However, Ke Wenzhe redefined"One China"This practice has caused a lot of controversy and dissatisfaction. His division seems to have been ignored"One China"Principles are a fact of general consensus in the international community, and his attempt to curry favor with the Green Camp by distinguishing between cultural, economic, and political dimensions coincides with his desire to reverse his approval ratings.

As far as culture is concerned, although Ko Wenzhe said that he identifies with Chinese culture and denies that there is a real one in Taiwan"De-sinicization"problem, but *** authorities are vigorously promoting it"De-sinicization"Syllabus, this contradiction is unbelievable. Although Ke Wenzhe's statement responded to the concerns of some people, it also deeply aroused the doubts and distrust of the mainland people towards Ke Wenzhe.

At the economic level, Ko Wenzhe advocates continuing to promote the cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), but only if the cross-strait agreement supervision regulations are passed, a position that essentially puts political issues ahead of the economic cooperation framework. Such a stance reveals distrust and a sense of crisis toward the mainland, and is tantamount to creating obstacles to cross-strait economic cooperation.

As for the political level, Ke Wenzhe said frankly that it will be realized"A political China"It's difficult. Although he did not explicitly state that Taiwan should be independent, this statement also hinted that he was in touch with"**"Correlation of forces. This kind of ambiguous and ambiguous statement made him lose his convincing power on the issue of ***, and also led to the suspicion of the mainland people about him.

Ke Wenzhe redefined"One China"is not only the result of his statement, but also the embodiment of his political purpose. He tried to differentiate himself from other politicians and attract more support from the Green CampAt the same time, he also tried to maintain a vague attitude on the *** issue in order to gain more voter support.

However, this did not have the desired effect. On the contrary, Ke Wenzhe's redefinition"One China"He lost some of the voters of the blue camp who originally supported him, and further aroused the distrust of the mainland people towards him. His remarks may have met the expectations of the green camp in form, but in essence, they exposed the ambiguity and ambiguity of his response plan.

Ke Wenzhe's redefinition"One China"Although clever in intent, the rhetoric is in essence an attempt to wink the eyes of the green camp and the electorate. However, his views are problematic in substance, both from the perspective of the general recognition of the international community and from the perspective of the development needs of the world"One China"Principles are indivisible. Ke Wenzhe's remarks will only make him lose the trust and support of the mainland people even more, and make his position on the *** issue more vague and elusive. Such efforts and statements will only make him further and further away from the basic consensus and fail to bring real benefits and development to Taiwan. And for the people of Taiwan and on both sides of the strait, a stable and peaceful *** is what they really need.

Related Pages