Another veteran with 24 years of military service gave up month by month and chose to change jobs

Mondo Military Updated on 2024-01-31

Recently, a Sichuan veteran, who has been in the army for 24 years, gave up the "month-by-month" of receiving more than 6,000 yuan in retirement pay and more than 800,000 yuan in retirement pay every month, and chose to "change jobs" and be placed in a second-tier city.

There are many people who have different opinions on the choice of this veteran, some are puzzled by his failure to work until retirement, and some think that he should choose to retire in a "month-by-month" way, after all, he can receive a retirement pension of more than 6,000 yuan per month after "month-by-month", and he can also find another job, isn't it also very fragrant?Of course, the majority agreed with his choice.

As for those who questioned that the veteran did not insist on working until retirement, they did not understand the current non-commissioned officer (non-commissioned officer) service policy. Since 2021, there have been new changes in the service policy of non-commissioned officers (non-commissioned officers), and the 4+x "flexible" service system has been implemented for middle and senior sergeants. That is: the minimum number of years of service for the second sergeant, the first sergeant, the first sergeant, and the second sergeant major are 4 years, and after 4 years of service, they can be promoted to a higher sergeant through the assessment, or they can choose to postpone their service, and the deferred service is based on 1 year, which can be extended separately4 years, 8 years, 10 years, 6 years**Sergeant Major and Sergeant Major II can be "retired" by extensionThe maximum period of active duty for a second sergeant is 16 years, the maximum number of years for a first class sergeant is 24 years, and the maximum number of years for a sergeant major and a second sergeant major is 30 years.

The veteran had served for 24 years, and after failing to be promoted to sergeant major, he had only two options: one was to postpone his service, and the other was to retire. Obviously, he chose to retire after a trade-off. Because the deferment of service needs to be evaluated every year, and he needs to be deferred 6 times to achieve retirement, there is no guarantee that the extension will be successful every time.

As for the choice of retirement method, he also came to the result after repeated evaluation. According to estimates, the monthly retirement allowance is about 6,000 yuan, and the one-time retirement pay is about 800,000 yuan (an increase compared with the "change of employment" placement).Employment AllowanceAt present, there is no housing loan and car loan, although the treatment is not low compared with the fifth-tier cities in my hometown after "month by month", but I am at a loss for the "employment" problem after retirement, and I am more confused.

The advantage of "changing jobs" is that the family members are registeredSichuan'sSecond-tier citiesAccording to his point ranking, he has a certain advantage in selecting posts, and can place a service technician post, corresponding to the salary of the main department;At present, he is 42 years old, and he can still work in the local area for 18 years, and with a local work platform, although he does not have too many expectations for his future personal development, there is a "circle" with a platform, which is also incomparable to "month by month".

Previously, in this year's resettlement of retired sergeants, there have been a number of retired "** sergeant majors and second-class sergeant majors" who have retired and chosen to be placed in "demobilization". For example, a second-class sergeant major with 26 years of military service (deferred service for 2 years) will be "transferred" to a municipal institution directly under Xi'an;A second-class sergeant major with 25 years of military experience (deferred service for 1 year) will be "transferred" to a unit at the same level in HangzhouA 20-year-old sergeant major, "transferred" to a non-public institution in Xi'an City, ......

Why is it that more and more senior sergeants are more inclined to "change careers" rather than "month by month" when they retire?

The most fundamental reason is that there is a panic about the uncertainty after the "month by month":

The first is employmentSkillsPanic。This is the most important reason, and the same goes for officers and sergeants. It is a general consensus that you must work after "month-by-month", which is determined by the mechanism of receiving retirement benefits month-by-month, otherwise, the treatment after reaching the statutory retirement age cannot be effectively guaranteed. However, most sergeants have served for 18 years or more, and if they choose to retire "month by month", they have no ideal jobs to choose from in the fierce social competition, and they can't all go to "be security guards", "deliver takeaways", and "open a taxi".

The second is the panic of policy continuity. In particular, during the period of military reform, new policies and regulations were intensively promulgated, and the results were both good and bad, and there was still the possibility of further adjustments.

Third, the stability of "job transfer" resettlement is more attractive. In contrast, the resettlement of "changing jobs" has a definite expectation for the future, although the income is high and low, but the overall is more ideal, and it is more obviously attractive than economically developed areas and cities.

Some people say that "self-choice of career" is designed for officers, and "month-by-month" is designed for non-commissioned officers (sergeants), obviously, such a judgment is not appropriate. In essence, "self-choice of career" is relative to officers, and "month-by-month" is relative to non-commissioned officers (non-commissioned officers).Settle for lessThat is, under the premise of having a relatively ideal choice of "changing jobs", few people choose to "choose their own jobs" or "month by month". Of course, for officers, the policy of "self-employment" has disappeared, and the attractiveness of "month by month" is necessarily reduced.

So, how to increase the attractiveness of the "month-by-month" policy?This is a topic that needs to be carefully studied in top-level design.

Give people roses, and there is a lingering fragrance in your hands!Your support is the biggest motivation for my creation. Project Sword

*From the Internet, infringement must be deleted).

Related Pages