Zhang's argument has sparked controversy and raised questions about the status of the humanities.
Zhang Xuefeng's sentence once again attracted people's attention, he declared that all humanities belong to the service industry, which can be summed up as "licking". These statements have sparked a great deal of controversy and criticism. Many humanities teachers believe that such prejudice is unfair to the humanities, and that the humanities are no longer as "watery" as Zhang Xuefeng said. Some netizens agreed, and pointed out that this statement is somewhat true, after all, whether it is in life, work, marketing and service industry everywhere. However, there are also people who feel that this sentence offends the employees of the service industry, and they feel that some service industries also have to pay for labor and should be respected.
Zhang Xuefeng's apology and reflection and his reflection on the development of the humanities.
Under the huge pressure, Zhang Xuefeng quickly stood up, apologized to everyone, and said that he was also in the service industry. His apology was quite sincere, even a little self-deprecating. He also said that his view is not that it is bad for art schools, but that he wants everyone to realize the limitations of art education and let more people work hard for it. However, some highly educated humanities scholars are unhappy with this. They feel that this sentence pokes at the "sensitive point" in the hearts of many people, including the lack of confidence of some liberal arts students in their work prospects and social situation. In fact, this problem is not only in the humanities, but in all walks of life.
On the Transformation and Challenges of the Humanities.
Some high-level figures have also openly criticized the humanities, pointing out that the humanities have a poor working environment and lack of core competitiveness. They also reminded students not to study liberal arts such as politics, geography, history, etc., which would make it difficult to find a job. Some even refer to such a profession as "a system that takes a lifetime." But we also have to see that in different cultural contexts, in different cultural contexts, in different cultural contexts, there are different cultural backgrounds. One move is the wrong one, but it cannot be denied that other industries have similar problems. As for those students who have chosen art and have low incomes, we can't just blame ourselves for not putting in enough effort. In fact, the positioning and value of the humanities do not depend on individual perceptions and attitudes, but on the "market".
Life experience and experience: pay is much more than pay, pay is essential.
As an editor of the Internet, I am from a liberal arts background, so I can say something about the liberal arts and the future. I had studied science myself, but not because of my hobbies or talents, but just because I wanted to find a secure job. However, such a decision does not satisfy or achieve me. Eventually, I decided to switch to online marketing, a field in which I've been doing my own thing. I realized that in addition to putting in more energy, I had to put in more energy. No matter what business you do, if you want to win, you must continue to work hard, keep learning Xi, and continue to develop.
Zhang Xuefeng's remarks have led to a huge debate about the status and value of humanities. Although the development of the humanities will encounter many challenges and changes, we must also realize that not only one person can be admitted, and the price paid is the same. In the process of continuous development and change, we must find our own position and value, and work hard for it. Whether it is a humanities subject, everyone should make appropriate decisions according to their own interests, talents, and market needs, and not be influenced by others. Each of us, as long as we are willing to pay, can break out of our own sky in this world.