In the pursuit of success, people often seek shortcuts and conveniences. Outrageous things happen all the time, and some people do whatever it takes, including spending money to buy exam qualifications, to get the credentials they need quickly. Recently, the China Judgments and Judgments Network published a case about the exemption of three subjects from one construction, which has attracted widespread attention. In this case, the plaintiff Mei signed a contract with Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company by paying 60,000 yuan, stipulating that the company could be exempted from three relevant examinations. However, it was later discovered that the information provided was false, resulting in the inability to use the corresponding certificate even if the exam was passed. Mei then filed a lawsuit against Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company, demanding the return of 60,000 yuan. After the trial, the court finally ruled to reject Mei's prosecution, and decided to transfer the relevant materials to the investigation agency to investigate the suspected forgery of documents and other criminal acts of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company.
In order to succeed, it is very important to obtain a Level 1 Constructor qualification in the construction industry, so many people will put in extra effort and money in the hope of passing the relevant exams as soon as possible. Mei is one of them. After learning that Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company could provide a plan for exemption from the examination, Mei became interested in it. Through a friend's introduction, he contacted the company and signed the relevant agreement. According to the agreement, Mei needs to pay a fee of 60,000 yuan and the company will register for the exam on her behalf. He was very pleased with being able to skip three subjects and was deeply proud of his decision. However, Mei did not know that the identity information he provided was actually false, including that he had forged other people's identity documents. This fact ended up costing him dearly for it.
In the case, Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company argued that it only registered based on the information provided by Mei and did not assume any responsibility. However, according to the WeChat chat records between Mei and Zhang Mouchao, the legal representative of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company, during the court trial, it can be clearly seen that Zhang Mouchao made it clear in the process of communicating with Mei that they could make a false first-class construction engineer certificate for Mei. They even discussed how to make the document and make sure they could pass the review and take the exam. This series of chat logs attests to the key role of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company in this incident.
During the trial, the two sides reached a consensus on the authenticity of the relevant evidence. Mei admitted that he successfully registered and took the exam with the help of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company. However, he also raised a crucial question: even if he passed the exam, the certificate he received was linked to his forged credentials and could not be actually used. Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company did not provide a convincing explanation for this problem, nor did it provide a solution. This convinced Mei that her prosecution was reasonable and necessary.
However, in the course of the trial, the court held that the actions of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company were suspected of forging official documents, certificates, seals and other criminal acts of state organs. In accordance with the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Involving Suspected Economic Crimes in the Trial of Economic Dispute Cases, the court decided to reject Mei's lawsuit and transfer the relevant materials to the investigating authorities for further investigation. This ruling means that Mei is unable to receive any compensation or recover the 60,000 yuan paid.
There are several important takeaways from this case. First of all, the pursuit of success cannot come at the expense of perverse means. Earning a certificate by waiving exams can pose significant ethical and legal concerns. Secondly, it is important to choose the right training provider. In Mei's case, he failed to carefully verify the qualifications and credibility of Guangzhou Construction Engineering Education Company, which led to his eventual loss. Finally, honesty and trustworthiness are the cornerstones of success. Honesty and integrity are the foundation of long-term development, regardless of the field, and violating this principle will bring irreparable damage to oneself and others.
To sum up, although it may seem like a very tempting option to skip three subjects in one building, we must be soberly aware of the risks and problems involved. Taking the exam legally and compliantly is the only reliable way to earn a certificate. It is only through real hard work and strength that we can achieve real success. Therefore, we should keep a clear head, avoid being deceived by rhetoric and illusions of quick success, and choose the right path for our life and career.