Currently, climate disasters cost the United States up to $150 billion a year, and economic losses have been increasing. As a warming climate increases, the risk of wildfires and floods increases, home insurance costs soar, agriculture takes a hit, food skyrockets, and hot weather leads to health care costs. Despite the economic chaos caused by this major issue, the Federal Reserve, which is responsible for maintaining economic stability, did not take into account the instability caused by climate change when setting monetary policy.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell made it clear earlier this year: "We will not interfere in climate policy." "Powell believes that in order to avoid political and market volatility, the Fed should focus on its primary responsibility to maintain economic stability, which is to ensure stability, prevent excessive inflation, and ensure that everyone has jobs. Powell believes that the Fed should avoid social and environmental issues that are not closely related to its main objectives.
However, the truth is that it will be increasingly difficult for the big banks to remain stable if they don't start thinking about the impact of climate change on their funding plans. As experts on big banks and climate justice, we recently published an article that examines the various monetary instruments that banks around the world can use to mitigate the effects of climate change and reduce our vulnerability to climate change. We believe that big banks should do more to tackle the climate crisis. That's because the recent U.S. Climate Report, along with other studies, shows that the U.S. isn't doing enough to tackle climate and that we're spending a lot of money.
Reconsider interest rates.
So here's the view of the big banks: they can lower the cost of people's investment in clean energy by lowering interest rates. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has already taken similar actions. In the United States, however, the chairman of the Federal Reserve has instead made things more difficult. In response to inflation, they have raised interest rates dramatically, but in reality this measure has not accelerated the shift to a greener lifestyle. As a result, it has become more difficult to invest in innovative projects such as offshore wind power, and some large projects have been put on hold because of high interest rates.
Big banks can strike a special deal that lets regular banks borrow from them at better interest rates, but only if the money is used for something meaningful like clean energy projects. Whether the Fed is able to do that depends on how they understand the rules they set. Although the Fed chairman has not tried this approach in the past, Chinese banks have taken similar action to encourage participation in the renewable energy sector. In addition, in Japan, banks provide interest-free loans for green projects.
Banks are urged to reconsider their investments.
Although the Fed's chair claims that they don't take sides, their money flows have been helping those big companies, especially in the fossil fuel industry. For example, during the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, the Federal Reserve fully supported money markets, and as a result, it provided a lot of additional assistance to fossil fuel companies indirectly. We considered two approaches to tackling climate change. First, the Fed could follow the example of the European Central Bank and consider climate change as an important part of its work to ensure economic stability. Alternatively, Congress could ask the Fed to make tackling climate change one of its official goals, similar to the Bank of England's focus on a "green" transition.
Both approaches would give the Fed chair more power to tackle climate change and help raise money to tackle climate issues, businesses, banks, ordinary people, and communities. In addition, the Fed can urge banks and wealthy people to stop putting money in areas that are harmful to the economy, for example by making rules that make investing in things that are harmful to the environment unpopular. The European Central Bank (ECB) has announced that it will start buying more environment-related corporate bonds.
As a result, the recent Fed's request to large banks to keep a close eye on the risks that climate change could pose has caused discontent among some Republicans, who believe that the Fed should not interfere in climate issues. We're not sure if this requirement will actually change the way banks lend. However, here's the idea: the Fed and other big banks could further set the rules to require them to make plans to shift to clean energy while keeping the economy stable. This is similar to the European Union, where they have a set of rules that prevent people from investing in things that are harmful to the environment and have implemented very environmentally friendly programs. Europe's big banks must comply with these rules so that they can support the EU's environmental policies.
The Fed has also used creation *** before
In the Fed's 110-year history, the Fed's chairman has often provided direct funding or purchased bonds to help the U.S. survive wars and recessions. When the pandemic hit, the Fed went all out to make sure that U.S. businesses didn't go bankrupt. We believe that the Fed should take climate change as seriously as it does any other crisis. In our research on the tools available to big banks, we look at it from a fair standpoint, not just reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Now, the U.S. is facing a huge cost challenge due to the chaos brought about by climate change. In our view, big banks should think more about long-term stability and not just focus on big business and the wealthy. They should put their money into communities and ordinary people who are struggling.
In fact, other large banks, such as the Bank of England and the European ** Bank, have already taken some actions that are good for the environment. However, Fed Chair Jerome Powell seems to be more worried about people's comments on him than about the huge challenges the US economy will face in the recent climate report. We believe that the Fed should take climate as seriously as it does a severe economic crisis and do everything it can to address it.
If you are interested in the article, please follow me or leave me a message