Premier Zhou and Chen Yonggui The confrontation in the history of the Republic

Mondo History Updated on 2024-01-19

Welcome to the 4073rd issue of Shiyuan History Column, today we will delve into a little-known story in Chinese history - the confrontation between * and ***.

Before he became deputy prime minister in 1975, his health was already quite grim. However, he still patiently communicated with *** and urged him to shoulder the heavy responsibility. **I never thought of entering *** and resigned many times, saying that I did not have enough cultural background to serve as deputy prime minister. ** But asked solemnly: "Are you still not a member of the Communist Party?".Party members should obey the arrangements of the organization. "In the end, at the insistence of ***, ** accepted the post of deputy prime minister.

This is not the only criticism of *** against ***, in fact, there are four in total. In the sixties and seventies of the last century, due to some special reasons, ** once became an "unspeakable" figure, and the Dazhai led by him was also controversial. However, in the eyes of ***, everything should be based on public intentions, and there is nothing that cannot be talked about.

The first criticism took place in May 1965. At that time, **had not yet entered**, but Dazhai's agriculture was famous. Even when foreign guests visit, the leaders often take them to visit and show the achievements of socialist construction. Kolega, Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Albania, came to Dazhai with ***, and *** accompanied him throughout the process. After the visit, the prime minister found *** alone and said: "There are almost no trees on your Hutou Mountain, which is not as good as Pingshun County, you have to learn from people Xi!."Although these words are subtle, the deep meaning is not difficult to understand. Of course, it is not that the scenery of Dazhai is not beautiful, but I hope that we will pay attention to the scientific and balanced transformation of the natural environment.

The second criticism took place in February 1969, when ** met with delegates from Shanxi in Beijing. In front of ***, the prime minister unceremoniously pointed out that *** has a "factional problem". * Said solemnly: "Learn from Xi Dazhai and Comrade Xi Yonggui, you must learn the good aspects, and you should not learn the bad ones." In recent months, ** has fallen into 'factionalism', and you can't learn from his faction. "At that time, there were two factions in the movement in Shanxi, the XPCC faction and the main station faction, which seriously interfered with agricultural production, and the prime minister was not satisfied with the performance of ***. **After the Ninth National Congress of the Communist Party of China, it was reviewed under the criticism of *** and others.

The third criticism occurred in November 1971, when the prime minister was intolerant of the shortcomings of the Dazhai model. Although "Dazhai of Agriculture" is the slogan put forward, it still points out: "The so-called 'Dagong and selflessness' is an ultra-leftist approach, and it is good that the masses can do it first and then private!Where can there be no private business?The prime minister disagreed with Dazhai's policy of abolishing self-reserved land and household sideline business, believing that these suggestions were not scientific enough, and made it clear that "Dazhai has shortcomings".

The last criticism took place in April 1973. Due to some policies in Shanxi Province, ** believed that Xie Zhenhua, the first secretary of the provincial party committee, opposed Dazhai, so he took the lead in boycotting the provincial Youth League Congress and did not let Dazhai send people. This behavior was abnormal, and after being learned of by ***, when he visited Dazhai in Echeverria, Mexico, he was severely criticized in the face of ***. **Following the advice of the Prime Minister, as soon as the visit of foreign guests ended, the representatives of Dazhai immediately went to the province for a meeting.

The above four criticisms all show a rigorous attitude and deep insight into the problem. In the historical process of this confrontation, we have seen superb leadership wisdom and concern for all aspects of socialist construction. This historical confrontation has become an important chapter in the history of the People's Republic of China, and it has also provided us with profound historical enlightenment today.

Epilogue. "Shiyuan History Column" will continue to pay attention to modern Chinese history, restore the whole picture of history for readers, and present more wonderful literary and historical content. The author looks forward to your valuable comments and suggestions, so stay tuned for more exciting articles. This history of confrontation between *** and *** is not only a collision of ideas, but also a vivid lesson in the construction of the republic.

Historical confrontation with ***: the wisdom and responsibility of leaders.

The article "The Confrontation with the History of the Republic of China" profoundly restores a little-known story in Chinese history and reveals the historical confrontation between *** and ***. This history is not only a contest between leaders, but also a vivid portrayal of the problems faced and carried out in socialist construction.

The attitude of ** is rigorous and clear, and the quality of adhering to principles and taking responsibility in the face of *** is deeply admired. For the first time in May 1965, the concern for environmental protection and agricultural science was demonstrated through the ecological balance of trees. This shows that he has not only the vision of a politician in the leadership, but also a leader with a forward-looking and comprehensive understanding of socialist construction. This high degree of knowledge and foresight has provided valuable guiding ideology for China's agricultural construction.

In the four criticisms, ** insisted on seeking truth from facts and treating problems fairly and fairly, which is particularly valuable for leaders. He did not evade problems or cover up shortcomings, but insisted on rational thinking, criticized the world, and promoted the scientificity and rationality of socialist construction. This leadership style, which dared to face problems head-on, dared to criticize, and put forward constructive suggestions, provided invaluable experience for China at that time.

At the same time, the performance of ** in this historical encounter is also impressive. After being criticized many times, he was able to accept it with an open mind, seriously review it, and make adjustments in the follow-up work, which shows his sense of responsibility and responsibility as a party member. Especially in the third criticism, his understanding of the concept of "selflessness" is different from that of the prime minister, and it also shows his adherence to the concept of socialism and his exploration of reform.

In the whole process of historical confrontation, it is not only the interaction between leaders, but also a profound reflection on the path of socialist construction. ** Through this confrontation, the questions raised about the environment, scientificity, rationality, etc., provided an important reference for the construction of socialism at that time. This period of history also reflects the twists and turns and explorations in socialist construction, and has positive enlightening significance for us to better understand the complexity and long-term nature of socialist construction today.

In the current process of socialist construction, we can draw lessons and lessons from this period of history, pay more attention to the construction of ecological and environmental protection, scientificity and rationality, and form a scientific decision-making and management system. At the same time, it is also necessary to maintain rational exchanges and criticisms among leaders, and promote the continuous progress of socialist construction through rational debate.

In general, this historical confrontation is a bright pearl in the process of China's socialist construction, and the dialogue and confrontation between ** and *** presents a profound ideological collision and a true portrayal of history. Such historical reflection has a far-reaching enlightening effect on our better understanding and construction of socialism.

Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!

Related Pages