The woman reported the chairman of the state-owned enterprise with her real name online and claimed that she would not file a case. Now that the ** report has been issued, the woman was slapped in the face.
On December 30, a woman reported Dai, the chairman of a state-owned enterprise, with her real name online. It is alleged that when the two were on a business trip, Dai tried to carry out ** on her at two o'clock in the middle of the night.
After the woman resisted fiercely, Dai did not succeed. After the incident, the woman reported the case and rushed to the scene to collect evidence. **The woman emphasized: After testing by the public security department, the residual DNA of the underwear is consistent with Dai's, but ** told the woman not to file a case.
The incident sparked heated discussions on the Internet, and netizens questioned the ** approach. Since there is evidence against Dai, why not file a case?
The local ** issued a situation notice, saying that the real situation did not match what the woman ** said. After review, ** has been opened for investigation, but the case is complex and is still under investigation.
According to the data, Dai, who is in his 50s, was appointed chairman of the company last year. If he is suspected of committing a crime, the law will punish him severely. This incident has aroused concern and a case has been opened for investigation. The public expects justice to be done and to uphold social fairness and the rule of law.
Even if it is not identified as an attempt, Dai's official position is difficult to protect. Dai DNA was found on women's underwear, and no matter what the circumstances, the moral problem is undoubted.
This is another incident in which a leading cadre can't control his lower body and causes a big disaster, I believe that Dai at this time, I'm afraid my intestines are repentant. What do you think about this?