Title: Iran is overturned? Red Sea fryer, Israel draws its knife against each other!
Recently, a dispute over the Red Sea in international waters has drawn widespread attention, even involving complex relations between Iran, the United States and Israel. The situation is so complex, let us take a closer look at the intricacies of this military international relationship.
First, we need to put ourselves in a hypothetical scenario in which the Red Sea becomes the "dominant" region of Iran, which is puzzling. In a recent warning from Iran's defense minister, he strongly opposed the creation of a "multinational escort coalition" in the Red Sea, claiming that no one else could act in the region. This raises the fundamental question, how did the Red Sea become Iranian territory? Isn't Iran a Red Sea littoral country? What's the secret here?
Iran's attitude seems to be inextricably linked to their "little partner" Houthi rebels in Yemen. Iran not only supports but also shelters Houthi attacks on civilian vessels. What are the reasons for this? The answer may lie in Iran's fear of Hamas's failure, which could lead Israel to target Iran's other interests. Iran's support for Hamas is not only based on alliances, but also on a deliberate view of its own interests.
Right now, the war in Gaza is in focus, and Iran is doing everything it can to call for a ceasefire. This appears to be an attempt to reduce pressure on Hamas, but it is actually a strategic consideration for Israel. Iran is well aware that a ceasefire would give Hamas a respite, and that it would be more difficult for Israel to completely eliminate Hamas. Iran's attitude toward Hamas has always been on the horizon, seemingly in an attempt to restrain Israel's actions and use Hamas as a bargaining chip to put pressure on Israel.
However, this is just one of the actions that Iran has taken to fear the defeat of Hamas. Iran, on the other hand, seems to be "betting on a ceasefire" to prevent the rout of Hamas. Recent reports on Iran have noticed a change in their winds, moving away from simply boasting about Hamas's successes to focusing more on Israel's brutality in Gaza, in an attempt to win back support from the international community. This may be a psychological hint to Iran's current situation in Gaza, realizing that Israel is gaining a tactical advantage and that Hamas may not be able to support it for long.
It is undeniable that Iran had hoped that Israel would be drawn into a larger conflict, that the entire Arab world and the Middle East would be able to jointly resist Israel. However, instead of Iran wishing, Israel has gained more support and motivation in this war. Against this backdrop, Iran may step up its cooperation with the United Nations and partners such as Russia to broker a ceasefire in Gaza in an attempt to save Hamas's fortunes. But it remains to be seen whether such efforts will change the tide of the fighting in Gaza.
Generally speaking, this game of military international relations involves the intricate interests of many countries and organizations. Iran's actions are both to protect its own interests and to try to maintain balance in the Middle East. Israel, on the other hand, has been resolute and resolute in its efforts to ensure its own security. The situation is complex, there are many variables, and the future trend is even more difficult. We need to keep a close eye on this international situation and see how the final course will evolve.