Title:
Hurry!Ukrainian brothers, how can you become a "prisoner of war" in less than 24 hours after assaulting the front line?The inside story is revealed, and you can't cry or laugh!”
On the front lines of Ukraine, there has been a series of incredible battles. In this emergency situation, Ukrainian soldiers were taken prisoner in less than 24 hours after arriving at the front line, raising widespread questions about the mobilization and training of the army. What's going on here?
One of the protagonists of the story is 23-year-old Ivan Rishilisky, who was captured in just a few hours, and one can't help but wonder how fast it is. Nikolai Dichenko, 47, from the city of Sumy, was also in the fighting in less than a day and was finally forced to surrender. Such rapid developments raise questions about the readiness and response of the Ukrainian army.
40-year-old Nikolai Schweik bluntly noted that there are obvious problems with mobilization and training. In his opinion, the training of soldiers does not seem to be adequate, and even somewhat ineffective. This state of affairs raises profound questions about the level of combat readiness of the entire Ukrainian army. Is this an individual problem, or is it a flaw in the overall mobilization and training mechanism?
Let's dig deeper into the root of this problem. We need more facts and details in this quick tiebreaker. It's not just about the fate of individual soldiers, it's about the security of the country as a whole. So, we began to wonder why this battle ended so hastily
We've heard some feedback, and some people think that this may be an isolated phenomenon, after all, the development of the war is difficult. But let's look at this from a different perspective and look at it from the level of national defense as a whole. Is this an unexpected situation, or is it a reflection of the problems of Ukraine's defense as a whole?
Take a look back at the experiences of these two soldiers. The story of Ivan Rishilisky and Nikolai Dychenko is not an isolated case, but a microcosm of a much larger problem. They were quickly ** on the battlefield, which one cannot help but call into question the overall readiness and reaction speed of the Ukrainian army. Has this happened in other military operations as well?
In deep thought, we can't help but pay attention to aspects such as the overall strategic planning, intelligence acquisition and command system of the Ukrainian army. This is not only a war with a quick solution, but also a test of the entire national strategic mechanism. Will we be able to find the shortcomings of Ukraine's defense presence and how we can improve it to ensure that the combat effectiveness of the soldiers is increased in the shortest possible time?
But in the midst of the voices of skepticism, we cannot ignore successful examples. It is possible that this battle is just an isolated incident, and the Ukrainian army may have behaved better in other areas. Therefore, we need to look at the whole picture of the problem in an objective and impartial manner.
Taken together, we call for a more in-depth study and scrutiny of the mobilization and training of the Ukrainian army. In such an emergency military environment, how to ensure that soldiers achieve the best condition in the shortest possible time and how to deal with unexpected situations is a question that requires deep thinking. This is not only about the lives of individual soldiers, but also about the security and stability of the entire country. Behind this battle is the test of a country's overall defense system, and it is also the focus of our common concern.