Beneath the surface of the water, far from calm, a storm of energy, strategy and international politics is brewing. It all started with the strange rupture of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, which not only affected the geopolitical chessboard, but also a profound challenge to the post-Cold War international order. Against this background, various countries have plunged into this war without gunpowder for their own interests. The background of the Nord Stream pipelines** incident is impregnated with the complexity of military strategy and energy warfare. As the main gas transmission pipeline connecting Russia and Germany, the Nord Stream pipeline series plays a pivotal role in the European energy market. However, under the enormous pressure of geopolitics, this important energy corridor has become the focus of international disputes.
Against this backdrop, the U.S. attitude towards the Nord Stream pipelines is complex and varied. On the one hand, the United States supports Europe's energy diversification, and on the other hand, it is also concerned about Russia's strengthening of its influence in Europe through energy exports. Against this backdrop, the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines has not only affected Europe's energy security, but also exacerbated international tensions. According to the analysis, if the sabotage of the pipeline is intentional, then there must be deep-seated military schemes and strategic interests hidden behind it. Whether it is the United States trying to weaken Russia's influence and prevent its support for Ukraine's actions, or other countries' self-interest considerations, the impact of this incident goes far beyond ordinary energy issues.
He described in detail the course of the U.S. plan and operation, saying that the U.S. had sent ** to the Baltic Sea to prepare to put pressure on Russia by sabotaging pipelines on the eve of Russia's special military operation. According to Hersh, American divers planted explosives near the Nord Stream pipelines, which were detonated with the assistance of the Norwegian Navy using low-frequency sonar equipment, resulting in damage to the pipelines. The operation was allegedly the result of nine months of secret consultations between the U.S. ** and *** teams. At the same time, the German side's investigation of the incident seems to point the finger at Ukraine, even suggesting that Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny may be involved in the sabotage of the pipeline.
In the face of an increasingly complex international situation, countries must re-examine their strategic choices and foreign policies. While pursuing national interests, we should not ignore the importance of maintaining international peace and stability. On this basis, all countries should strive for cooperation and win-win results, rather than achieving short-term goals through sabotage and confrontation. It is only in an atmosphere of openness, transparency and dialogue that the international community can work together to overcome challenges and achieve lasting peace and prosperity.