In this intricate game of chess, we see an ingenious conspiracy, with renowned American journalist Seymour Hersh picking on silence and accusing the United States of deliberately sabotaging the Nord Stream pipelines in order to stop Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine. Is this a win-win situation, or is it an ingenious layout full of political calculations?
Recall that in September 2022, the United States ** Biden postponed the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines. This is not an accident, but a mental game by Biden against German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Biden expressed concern about Germany's hesitation to support Ukraine, which may not only be for Ukraine, but more likely to be Biden's layout of a larger chessboard of international relations.
Behind the conspiracy, the United States has long been premeditated. In the weeks leading up to Russia's special military operation in Ukraine, the United States sent personnel to the Baltic Sea to prepare for it. This is not to convince Putin to stop, but to force Russia to make concessions by destroying the Nord Stream pipelines. This well-planned action is in fact a clever performance on the international political stage.
Incredibly, Hersh obtained information revealing that plans to sabotage the Nord Stream pipelines were ready as early as late May 2022, but Biden postponed the operation without any explanation. It was not until the end of September of the same year that the personnel on the mission received an order from Biden to destroy three Nord Stream pipelines by detonating ** devices. This conspiracy was carried out as early as 9 months of secret consultations between Biden and the US *** team.
The German investigation, however, pointed the finger at Ukraine, and even implicated Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny. Is this a deliberately misleading elaborate design?Perhaps this is the key reason why Western countries remain silent, because the tortuous path to truth is not so straightforward.
For now, Western countries seem bent on shifting the blame to Ukraine. This hand is extremely cunning, because if it had been a pipeline sabotaged by Russia or Ukraine, the West would have stood on the moral high ground with righteous indignation. The U.S. actions have made this conspiracy confusing, and other Western countries have no motive or possibility to bear such a large responsibility, and the only person to blame seems to be Ukraine.
Today, we are faced with a seemingly unsolvable mystery. Was it Russia, Ukraine or the United States that sabotaged the Nord Stream pipelines?The truth may forever be buried in the fog of international politics. This is reminiscent of the complexities of international relations, where the fuse of a war can be hidden in the deepest depths of the political game.
In this game of international politics, the game of power and power has long exceeded our imagination. Is the U.S. conspiracy just to preserve Ukraine, or is there a deeper strategic calculation behind it?Is Biden's concern for the German Chancellor simply concerned about European security, or is it a complex economic and geopolitical calculation?
Perhaps, we should look at all this in more nuance. The Nord Stream pipeline is not only a hub for energy transportation, but also a place where economy and geopolitics are entangled. Whether or not the US action is just a superficial political show is in fact deeply rooted in the global strategic competition.
Biden's concern about German Chancellor Olaf Scholz may be more about maintaining US hegemony in Europe. Germany has always been the engine of the European economy, and the control of the Nord Stream pipelines as a link for the delivery of Russian gas means a commanding height in geopolitics. The United States may have long understood that the key to maintaining a leading position in the global landscape lies in Europe.
In this international wrangling, the caution of the United States is evident. The decision to postpone the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines shows Biden's thoughtfulness about the situation. After all, taking radical action too soon could provoke international discontent and, more likely, lead to instability within Europe.
Perhaps, we are in the midst of an even larger mystery. Who is behind the scenes, is it the United States that is planning to maintain geopolitical hegemony, or is it simply acting to support Ukraine?All of this may be beyond our limited understanding. The uncertainty of international politics lies in the depths of this mystery.
At the same time, Germany faces an extremely difficult choice in this game. As German Chancellor, Scholz cannot ignore economic ties with Russia while supporting Ukraine. The destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines is undoubtedly a major challenge to Germany. How to find a balance between maintaining international prestige and economic interests has become an unavoidable problem for Germany.
While we are trying to lift the veil on this international political conspiracy, the international community remains silent. Is it a tacit acquiescence to the United States, or is it a disregard for the truth?This silence makes the truth of the whole incident even more confusing. Perhaps, the truth has long been drowned out by the dark curtain of power and politics, and we can only think in this silence.
It is worth pondering whether this incident marks a great change in the international landscapeDoes it mean that the United States will start a new round of geopolitical competition?Or is this just the tip of the iceberg, with an even larger political maelstrom brewing in the distance?The changes in the future may be far more ambitious than what we have seen, and this game of international politics may be just the beginning.
(Disclaimer) The article describes the process, **all** on the Internet, this article aims to advocate positive social energy, no vulgarity and other bad guidance. If copyright or character infringement is involved, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible!If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.