ContemporarySocialThe economic landscape and career development often bring unexpected and dramatic changes. Just like Dong Yuhui, a young man from a small town who came out of the countryside, jumped from an English training teacher to a vice president and executive of the group company, and experienced a gorgeous counterattack in his life. Such a plot is difficult for even the most imaginative screenwriter to conceive.
Driven by information technology, the emerging business model of live streaming is in full swing. In addition to Dong Yuhui, many people and companies have achieved a counterattack because of this. XindongThrough the establishment of Oriental Selection, Fang re-emerged in the industry, and the company's revenue and stock price were both harvested. Once causedHammerTechnologyLuo Yonghao, who failed and fell into debt, successfully paid off his debts and devoted himself to a new one with the help of the live streaming platform "Make a Friend".Start a businessProject. Li Guoqing seized the opportunity of live streaming and chose highProfitsof drinks and books, regained its success. At the same time, the education industry's Xueersi, Gaotu, and celebritiesZhang LanJia Nailiangand so on have also entered the field of live streaming. Even the closed Tianya community borrowedStart a businessThe craze has restarted Tianya Selection. These various changes have made live streaming becomingInterneton the largestFlowA gathering place, full of dramatic developments.
1. The interests of second-hand dealers and consumers
Live streaming is essentially a kind of second-class trafficking behavior, and the benefits obtained by consumers may not necessarily meet expectations. While some people believe that livestreaming reduces middlemen earning the difference in prices and brings benefits to consumers in a sense, many streamers get high commissions. Consumers aren't necessarily the biggest beneficiaries.
2. Lack of innovative technologies to promote social progress
Live streaming has not brought real innovative technology, there is no promotionSocialProgressive. Some anchors answered yes when asked about their core competitivenessChainand product selection system. Fundamentally, however, this did not pushSocialProgressive innovative technology.
3. Poor value orientation
Successful cases of live broadcasting, such as Luo Yonghao's debt repaymentXindongFang Huan's second spring and Dong Yuhui's counterattack conveyed to people a value orientation of "selling goods to make quick money" to get rich easily. If everyone fantasizes about making a lot of money by selling goods, who wants to concentrate on technology and actually do manufacturing?
Compared with the ban on online live streaming in some countries in Southeast Asia, we should also think about the next question: what would happen if there was no live streaming?
Without live streaming, offline consumption and the market may be more prosperous. Although consumers may have to pay more**, it will be brought to more dealersProfitsto create more jobs and feed more families. So this is a question worth pondering.
In the long run, we need more likeHuaweiSameTechnologyEnterprise, inChipsArtificial intelligence, operating systems and other basic areas of innovation. We would like to see more talented people focus on researching technology, rather than just making quick money selling online. Even if we become the world's largest livestreaming marketplace, what can we do?
In general, the live broadcast brings goods toInternetbrought a huge oneFlowand business opportunities, which also enabled some people to quickly achieve a counterattack. However, we need to be soberly aware that live streaming is not a way out for everyone, and it cannot be promotedSocialProgress is not a dream worth chasing for everyone. We should pay more attention to technological innovation and industrial upgradingSocialDeliver real long-term benefits.