On December 12, according to the official WeChat message of the First Court of Chengdu Railway, the first-instance verdict of the Chengdu Metro case of being framed was announced.
Mr. He, the party to the framed ** case, posted a response on the Internet**, saying that he had waited for 6 months to defend his rights, and received the verdict of the first instance today, and regretted that all his claims were rejected.
Whether or not to continue the appeal Mr. Ho said that he still needs to discuss it with the lawyer, but he is personally inclined to continue the appeal.
What is the jurisprudence of losing a court case?
How could a case with such clear facts be the result of such a sentence?
One is that the scope of influence was originally small, but the man magnified the incident on the Internet was done by him, and the second is that the appeal was unreasonable, and the party Mr. He asked the two women to read the apology letter or something, read it for ten days.
The court felt that this claim was unreasonable, saying that the two women had apologized, and the parties also posted the incident on the Internet, causing adverse effects.
But the key is to spread rumors about you in a public place, and then apologize to you in private, and this matter is over?
This was not the case when the rumors were spread back then, and it was true that both parties were damaged when they spread, but the victims did not accept a private apology, and it was reasonable to want to take a breath.
After all, is it really settled to apologize in private?Wouldn't it be a moral bottom line if there is no loss from casual rumors?
It is also rumor-mongering, and the results are very different, so I can't help but put a question mark on the so-called "fairness".
As the saying goes, when you enter the bar, you feel like home, and when you enter the subway, it is like a battlefield. Some women take advantage of their privileges to make irresponsible statements that undermine the power of women in general.
There is a very unique one on a certain platform, which is broadcast live on the Internet every day to ask girls to recognize the money owner, how to make money.
I introduced the robot account to evaluate it before, and I originally thought it was an account for a gimmick, draining traffic in the comment area, just to attract people to scold her to increase popularity.
Unexpectedly, he was suspected of fraud, taught women to be independent, and then went to the rich to fulfill himself. This set of processes, there are actually training courses, and someone really pays for it?
There are also women who sign up for classes and find out that they have been deceived, which can't help but doubt the values of some people.
If she really had a rich man, she would have gone to enjoy happiness a long time ago. Can you also start classes online?
The key is that there are still a group of fans on this account who really believe that if you change your gender, the man will teach people to fish for rich women. The ending is different.
This kind of double-standard behavior not only fails to protect legitimate rights and interests, but also exacerbates so-called prejudice.