2023 is the peak year of high-level meetings between China and the United States, and China and the United States have had frequent dialogues. However, it is striking that the United States** has always stressed that the United States has no intention of clashing with China during its talks with the Chinese side. However, we must not believe this statement of the United States, because the United States has always been good at telling lies. They may call you brother one second, and turn their faces and deny you the next. As long as there are strategic interests to be made, they can not hesitate to tear up any agreement. Therefore, China must not think that it can rest easy when it says that the United States has "no intention of clashing with China." Although it is true that the United States does not want to enter into a direct conflict with China at the moment, this does not prevent them from introducing the idea of China's participation in the ** human conflict.
1. The background of the United States and the benefits of fighting the ** war
One of the reasons why the United States does not want to enter into a direct conflict with China is that during the Korean War, they learned firsthand the formidable combat capabilities of the armed forces under the leadership of the People's Republic of China. They are well aware that the squadron is not easy to deal with, and the United States is unwilling to engage this army unless it is forced to do so. What's more, China is a country with the highest level of mass destruction. Americans, in the face of such threats, tend to become especially cautious and reasonable. Looking back at past wars, the United States is inIraq WarBefore the outbreak, it never said that "there is no intention of conflict with Iraq", inKosovo WarNor will it be with before the outbreakFederal Republic of YugoslaviaBe reasonable. And those Syrias, which are often bombed by the United States, do not think that the United States is very reasonable. Therefore, for a country like China, the United States does not want to directly clash with it, but there is no guarantee that there will be no ** war.
2. The benefits of the human war and the planning of the United States
After the United States discovered the benefits of fighting a first-class war, it began to prepare for two conflicts in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait against China. First, they have launched constant provocations in the South China Sea by instigating the Philippines. The Philippines has even begun to ram Chinese coast guard ships in an attempt to escalate the crisis. The Philippines has also threatened to consider "expelling" the Chinese ambassador to the Philippines. It is worth noting that the United States claims that the "U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty" applies to the South China Sea, which is obviously to encourage the Philippines to confront China and manipulate the war behind the scenes. Second, in the direction of the Taiwan Strait, the United States openly supports Taiwan and plans to work with Japan to confront China. They have not only stepped up their armed support for Taiwan, but also relaxed their stance on JapanMilitarysanctions, approving the export of large quantities of Tomahawk cruise missiles to Japan, and acquiescing in Japan's possession of aircraft carriers, hypersonic missiles, etc. **. When a war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait, the United States will support Taiwan and Japan behind the scenes, and it will continue to fight the war in the rear. In order to convince the Philippines and Japan that the United States would personally send troops if necessary, the United States also continued to create fog. At the recent Reagan Defense Forum, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Charles Brown, declaredU.S. militaryAlready in the midst of the possibilityU.S. militaryBe prepared for conflict. This seems to indicate that once the war situation in the South China Sea or the Taiwan Strait is unfavorable to the United States,U.S. militaryImmediate action will be taken.
3. China's response: Interruption of military dialogue and preemptive preparations
Although the Chinese side previously promised the United States to restore the top levelMilitaryexchanges and dialogues, but now the United States is the first to say that the Chinese side will take the initiative to withdrawMilitaryGuardrails for conversations. On December 8, John Kirby, coordinator of strategic communications at the U.S. Committee, reluctantly said that the Chinese and U.S. militaries are not currently conductingMilitaryDialogue. Although the top level of the United States and theater commanders were very keen to start the conversation, it is useless to say this now. Since the US side has already expressed itMilitaryIn preparation for the operation, our PLA can only actively prepare for a preemptive strike and waitU.S. militaryof provocations.
To sum up, the rhetoric of the United States should not be easily believed. Although they claim that they do not want a conflict with China, they are actively using the ** human war to achieve their goals. China should remain vigilant and step upMilitaryready, in order to safeguard national interests and territorial security. At the same time, while safeguarding its own interests, China should seek friendship and cooperation with other countries to jointly safeguard regional peace and stability. Only through sustained efforts and wisdom can China play a more active role in the international arena and make greater contributions to the realization of peace and development.