A new round of Israeli-Palestinian conflict has erupted again, and the two sides have failed to extend the period of peace after a temporary ceasefire, and the Gaza Strip has once again become the focus of the conflict. Although both sides have expressed their willingness to resolve the issue through negotiations, the reality is not encouraging. The Israeli military announced that it had resumed combat operations in the Gaza Strip, while the Palestinian side also said it had been hit by Israeli airstrikes. The conflict between Israel and Hamas has always been the focus of the international community. The failure of the two sides to agree on an extension of the ceasefire after the expiration of the temporary ceasefire period led to another escalation of the conflict. Although both sides have expressed their willingness to resolve the conflict through negotiations, the actual situation may be more complicated. The Israeli side announced that it had resumed military operations, while the Palestinian side also said that it had been hit by Israeli air strikes, and the negotiations between the two sides on the exchange of detainees reached an impasse and it was difficult to reach a compromise anytime soon. According to Palestinian sources, the Israeli army has launched air strikes on several areas in the northern, central, and southern Gaza Strip, and has clashed fiercely with Palestinian militants in Gaza City and other places. At least 32 Palestinians have been killed and dozens more injured in this round of clashes.
This was preceded by a series of releases of detainees, but this did not change the dynamics of the conflict. Under such circumstances, the international community is concerned about whether the two sides will be able to resolve their differences through negotiations. The humanitarian** and humanitarian crisis caused by the conflict is worrying, so how to resolve the differences between the two sides and achieve a ceasefire as soon as possible has become an urgent issue for the international community to solve. In view of the current situation, the international community should strengthen its good offices and promote dialogue between the two sides on a ceasefire and the settlement of differences, so as to avoid further escalation of the conflict. At the same time, it is also necessary to pay attention to the humanitarian problems in the Gaza Strip and provide humanitarian assistance to the local population to mitigate the impact of the conflict on the local population. After this round of conflicts, whether the two sides can reach a compromise through negotiations and achieve a ceasefire as soon as possible is an urgent issue facing both sides. It is hoped that the two sides will respond calmly, resolve differences through dialogue, end the conflict as soon as possible, and create conditions for peace and stability. The conflict between Israel and Hamas has been the focus of much attention. Hamas wants to release the detained Israelis in exchange for the release of the detained Palestinians and a moratorium on military operations.
However, as fewer and fewer detained civilians are released by Hamas, the exchange of detained Israeli military personnel is bound to become the focus of negotiations, and Hamas will make a higher asking price. In 2011, Israel released 1,027 Palestinians, including prominent Hamas figures, in exchange for captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. The Israeli army estimates that its recent military operations have killed more than 5,000 Hamas fighters, while Hamas has a total of about 2With 50,000 armed men, Israel is far from achieving its military goal of "eliminating Hamas". As a result, negotiations between the two sides have become more complicated. During the negotiations, Hamas put forward a number of conditions, such as Israel's commitment to a long-term ceasefire, the lifting of the blockade of the Gaza Strip, and the release of all more than 8,500 Palestinians in detention. However, Israel rejected these conditions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made it clear that only a temporary ceasefire of up to 10 days can be accepted. The differences between the two sides have brought the negotiations to an impasse. Although Israel's recent military operations have dealt a blow to Hamas, they have not achieved its military goal of eliminating Hamas. Both sides need a ceasefire, and from the Israeli side, many detainees remain unreleased.
While the families demanded that the detainees continue to be rescued, Israel** faced political pressure to extend the ceasefire at home. From Hamas's point of view, Israeli military strikes and blockades have not only damaged military installations and left Hamas without supplies, but also led to a large number of civilians** and displacement in Gaza, which makes Hamas urgently need a ceasefire to protect the residents of the Gaza Strip. Despite the resurgence of the conflict, analysts believe that Israel and Hamas have not stopped contacting, and negotiations remain the first choice for both sides. There are differences between the two sides, but there is a need for a ceasefire on both sides. Faced with the complexity of the situation on both sides, the conflict may be interrupted, but the two sides may eventually negotiate some kind of compromise. This complex situation is still developing, and we will continue to follow and closely monitor the developments of both sides. Hamas is eager for a ceasefire that will allow respite and relief for the people of Gaza. The international community has been working hard to broker a ceasefire and negotiations between the two sides. U.S. support is also waning, with the U.S. secretary of state even speaking out against the massive civilian population during a visit to Israel and calling for more precision in military action. Analysts point out that the two sides are likely to continue to hesitate between military action and negotiations, which could lead to an ongoing conflict.
However, a genuine ceasefire will not be easy because there are hard-liners in Israel who advocate a definitive solution to the Hamas problem through military action. If Israel fails to achieve its goals, it may face the discontent of the hard-line populace and the risk of its downfall. In the long run, whoever governs, Israel will face the task of responding to the threat posed by Hamas. Hamas is eager for a ceasefire that will allow respite and relief for the people of Gaza. The international community has been working hard to broker a ceasefire and negotiations between the two sides. U.S. support is also waning, with the U.S. secretary of state speaking out against large-scale civilians during a visit to Israel and calling for more precision in military action. Analysts point out that the two sides are likely to continue to hesitate between military action and negotiations, which could lead to an ongoing conflict. However, a genuine ceasefire will not be easy because there are hard-liners in Israel who advocate a definitive solution to the Hamas problem through military action. If Israel fails to achieve its goals, it may face the discontent of the hard-line populace and the risk of its downfall. In the long run, whoever governs, Israel will face the task of responding to the threat posed by Hamas.